mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Gaussian Process Morphable Models

arXiv 1603.07254 ↗First posted 23 Mar 2016cs.CVcited by 31

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Statistical shape models (SSMs) represent a class of shapes as a normal distribution of point variations, whose parameters are estimated from example shapes. Principal component analysis (PCA) is applied to obtain a low-dimensional representation of the shape variation in terms of the leading principal components. In this paper, we propose a generalization of SSMs, called Gaussian Process Morphable Models (GPMMs). We model the shape variations with a Gaussian process, which we represent using the leading components of its Karhunen-Loeve expansion. To compute the expansion, we make use of an approximation scheme based on the Nystrom method. The resulting model can be seen as a continuous analogon of an SSM. However, while for SSMs the shape variation is restricted to the span of the example data, with GPMMs we can define the shape variation using any Gaussian process. For example, we can build shape models that correspond to classical spline models, and thus do not require any example data. Furthermore, Gaussian processes make it possible to combine different models. For example, an SSM can be extended with a spline model, to obtain a model that incorporates learned shape characteristics, but is flexible enough to explain shapes that cannot be represented by the SSM. We introduce a simple algorithm for fitting a GPMM to a surface or image. This results in a non-rigid registration approach, whose regularization properties are defined by a GPMM. We show how we can obtain different registration schemes,including methods for multi-scale, spatially-varying or hybrid registration, by constructing an appropriate GPMM. As our approach strictly separates modelling from the fitting process, this is all achieved without changes to the fitting algorithm. We show the applicability and versatility of GPMMs on a clinical use case, where the goal is the model-based segmentation of 3D forearm images.

Key facts. Cited by 31 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 11; 2022: 10; 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

31 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Accurate Point Cloud Registration with Robust Optimal Transportcited by 38
  2. 2022Topology-Preserving Shape Reconstruction and Registration via Neural Diffeomorphic Flowcited by 38
  3. 2023Dynamic Point Fieldscited by 37
  4. 2021Learning Parallel Dense Correspondence from Spatio-Temporal Descriptors for Efficient and Robust 4D Reconstructioncited by 31
  5. 2021Sparse to Dense Dynamic 3D Facial Expression Generationcited by 18
  6. 2022Deep Deformable 3D Caricatures with Learned Shape Controlcited by 10
  7. 2022Generating Multiple 4D Expression Transitions by Learning Face Landmark Trajectoriescited by 7
  8. 2024Neuromorphic Facial Analysis with Cross-Modal Supervisioncited by 7
  9. 2022RFNet-4D++: Joint Object Reconstruction and Flow Estimation from 4D Point Clouds with Cross-Attention Spatio-Temporal Featurescited by 5
  10. 2025InstaFace: Identity-Preserving Facial Editing with Single Image Inferencecited by 5
  11. 2021Uncertainty-Aware Annotation Protocol to Evaluate Deformable Registration Algorithmscited by 3
  12. 2021Learning the shape of female breasts: an open-access 3D statistical shape model of the female breast built from 110 breast scanscited by 3
19 more
  1. 2024MIRACLE3D: Memory-efficient Integrated Robust Approach for Continual Learning on Point Clouds via Shape Model Constructioncited by 3
  2. 2022Approximating Intersections and Differences Between Linear Statistical Shape Models Using Markov Chain Monte Carlocited by 2
  3. 2024Spatio-temporal Transformers for Action Unit Classification with Event Camerascited by 2
  4. 2021Bone Surface Reconstruction and Clinical Features Estimation from Sparse Landmarks and Statistical Shape Models: A feasibility study on the femurcited by 1
  5. 20213D Face Recognition: A Surveycited by 1
  6. 2021Beyond Flatland: Pre-training with a Strong 3D Inductive Biascited by 1
  7. 2021Geodesic squared exponential kernel for non-rigid shape registrationcited by 1
  8. 2022A statistical shape model for radiation-free assessment and classification of craniosynostosiscited by 1
  9. 2022Anatomically Parameterized Statistical Shape Model: Explaining Morphometry through Statistical Learningcited by 1
  10. 2022Building 3D Generative Models from Minimal Datacited by 1
  11. 2026High-Fidelity Single-Image Head Modeling with Industry-Grade Topologycited by 1
  12. 2021Few-Data Guided Learning Upon End-to-End Point Cloud Network for 3D Face Recognitioncited by 0
  13. 2021Dynamic multi feature-class Gaussian process modelscited by 0
  14. 2022GiNGR: Generalized Iterative Non-Rigid Point Cloud and Surface Registration Using Gaussian Process Regressioncited by 0
  15. 2022Probabilistic Registration for Gaussian Process 3D shape modelling in the presence of extensive missing datacited by 0
  16. 2024exploreCOSMOS: Interactive Exploration of Conditional Statistical Shape Models in the Web-Browsercited by 0
  17. 2025Posterior shape models revisited: Improving 3D reconstructions from partial data using target specific modelscited by 0
  18. 2026PRISM: A 3D Probabilistic Neural Representation for Interpretable Shape Modelingcited by 0
  19. 2026MorphoFlow: Sparse-Supervised Generative Shape Modeling with Adaptive Latent Relevancecited by 0