Elicitation for Aggregation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the problem of eliciting and aggregating probabilistic information from multiple agents. In order to successfully aggregate the predictions of agents, the principal needs to elicit some notion of confidence from agents, capturing how much experience or knowledge led to their predictions. To formalize this, we consider a principal who wishes to elicit predictions about a random variable from a group of Bayesian agents, each of whom have privately observed some independent samples of the random variable, and hopes to aggregate the predictions as if she had directly observed the samples of all agents. Leveraging techniques from Bayesian statistics, we represent confidence as the number of samples an agent has observed, which is quantified by a hyperparameter from a conjugate family of prior distributions. This then allows us to show that if the principal has access to a few samples, she can achieve her aggregation goal by eliciting predictions from agents using proper scoring rules. In particular, if she has access to one sample, she can successfully aggregate the agents' predictions if and only if every posterior predictive distribution corresponds to a unique value of the hyperparameter. Furthermore, this uniqueness holds for many common distributions of interest. When this uniqueness property does not hold, we construct a novel and intuitive mechanism where a principal with two samples can elicit and optimally aggregate the agents' predictions.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2014.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2025Beyond Majority Voting: LLM Aggregation by Leveraging Higher-Order Informationcited by 26
- 2021Are You Smarter Than a Random Expert? The Robust Aggregation of Substitutable Signalscited by 13
- 2025SelectMix: Enhancing Label Noise Robustness through Targeted Sample Mixingcited by 5
- 2025Robust forecast aggregation via additional queriescited by 3
- 2025Tell Me Why: Incentivizing Explanationscited by 1
- 2026Prior-Agnostic Robust Forecast Aggregationcited by 1
- 2022Price Interpretability of Prediction Markets: A Convergence Analysiscited by 0
- 2022Sample Complexity of Forecast Aggregationcited by 0
- 2026Two Heads Are Better Than One: Aggregating Weaker LLMs for Better Forecastscited by 0
- 2026Two Heads Are Better Than One: Aggregating Weaker LLMs for Better Forecasts27 Sep 2026
- 2026Prior-Agnostic Robust Forecast Aggregation27 Apr 2026
- 2025Robust forecast aggregation via additional queries4 Dec 2025
- 2025Beyond Majority Voting: LLM Aggregation by Leveraging Higher-Order Information1 Oct 2025
- 2025SelectMix: Enhancing Label Noise Robustness through Targeted Sample Mixing14 Sep 2025
- 2025Tell Me Why: Incentivizing Explanations19 Feb 2025
- 2022Sample Complexity of Forecast Aggregation26 Jul 2022
- 2022Price Interpretability of Prediction Markets: A Convergence Analysis18 May 2022
- 2021Are You Smarter Than a Random Expert? The Robust Aggregation of Substitutable Signals4 Nov 2021