mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

New Algorithms for Learning Incoherent and Overcomplete Dictionaries

arXiv 1308.6273 ↗First posted 28 Aug 2013cs.DS cs.LG stat.MLcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In sparse recovery we are given a matrix A (the dictionary) and a vector of the form A X where X is sparse, and the goal is to recover X. This is a central notion in signal processing, statistics and machine learning. But in applications such as sparse coding, edge detection, compression and super resolution, the dictionary A is unknown and has to be learned from random examples of the form Y = AX where X is drawn from an appropriate distribution --- this is the dictionary learning problem. In most settings, A is overcomplete: it has more columns than rows. This paper presents a polynomial-time algorithm for learning overcomplete dictionaries; the only previously known algorithm with provable guarantees is the recent work of Spielman, Wang and Wright who gave an algorithm for the full-rank case, which is rarely the case in applications. Our algorithm applies to incoherent dictionaries which have been a central object of study since they were introduced in seminal work of Donoho and Huo. In particular, a dictionary is μ-incoherent if each pair of columns has inner product at most μ / √n. The algorithm makes natural stochastic assumptions about the unknown sparse vector X, which can contain k ≤ c min(√n/μ log n, m1/2 -η) non-zero entries (for any η > 0). This is close to the best k allowable by the best sparse recovery algorithms even if one knows the dictionary A exactly. Moreover, both the running time and sample complexity depend on log 1/ε, where ε is the target accuracy, and so our algorithms converge very quickly to the true dictionary. Our algorithm can also tolerate substantial amounts of noise provided it is incoherent with respect to the dictionary (e.g., Gaussian). In the noisy setting, our running time and sample complexity depend polynomially on 1/ε, and this is necessary.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2013.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 3; 2023: 6; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

22 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Cross-Node Federated Graph Neural Network for Spatio-Temporal Data Modelingcited by 69
  2. 2021Stable and Interpretable Unrolled Dictionary Learningcited by 15
  3. 2025Position: Mechanistic Interpretability Should Prioritize Feature Consistency in SAEscited by 14
  4. 2022Simple Alternating Minimization Provably Solves Complete Dictionary Learningcited by 6
  5. 2023Personalized Dictionary Learning for Heterogeneous Datasetscited by 5
  6. 2022Masked prediction tasks: a parameter identifiability viewcited by 4
  7. 2024Towards scientific discovery with dictionary learning: Extracting biological concepts from microscopy foundation modelscited by 4
  8. 2022Dictionary Learning for the Almost-Linear Sparsity Regimecited by 3
  9. 2025Personalized Convolutional Dictionary Learning of Physiological Time Seriescited by 2
  10. 2026Mechanistic Tomography: Designed Measurement for Control-Oriented Interpretabilitycited by 2
  11. 2021Non-Convex Compressed Sensing with Training Datacited by 1
  12. 2021Deep learning based dictionary learning and tomographic image reconstructioncited by 1
10 more
  1. 2023Convergence of alternating minimisation algorithms for dictionary learningcited by 1
  2. 2026A Unifying Framework for Unsupervised Concept Extractioncited by 1
  3. 2023Learning Large Scale Sparse Modelscited by 0
  4. 2023Learning Trees of ℓ0-Minimization Problemscited by 0
  5. 2023Hiding Data Helps: On the Benefits of Masking for Sparse Codingcited by 0
  6. 2023Estimation of Models with Limited Data by Leveraging Shared Structurecited by 0
  7. 2024Efficient Matrix Factorization Via Householder Reflectionscited by 0
  8. 2025Dictionary Learning: The Complexity of Learning Sparse Superposed Features with Feedbackcited by 0
  9. 2026Concept Component Analysis: A Principled Approach for Concept Extraction in LLMscited by 0
  10. 2026Iterative Atom Refinement: A Monotonicity Principle for Dictionary Learningcited by 0