Artificial Intelligence Framework for Simulating Clinical Decision-Making: A Markov Decision Process Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the modern healthcare system, rapidly expanding costs/complexity, the growing myriad of treatment options, and exploding information streams that often do not effectively reach the front lines hinder the ability to choose optimal treatment decisions over time. The goal in this paper is to develop a general purpose (non-disease-specific) computational/artificial intelligence (AI) framework to address these challenges. This serves two potential functions: 1) a simulation environment for exploring various healthcare policies, payment methodologies, etc., and 2) the basis for clinical artificial intelligence - an AI that can think like a doctor. This approach combines Markov decision processes and dynamic decision networks to learn from clinical data and develop complex plans via simulation of alternative sequential decision paths while capturing the sometimes conflicting, sometimes synergistic interactions of various components in the healthcare system. It can operate in partially observable environments (in the case of missing observations or data) by maintaining belief states about patient health status and functions as an online agent that plans and re-plans. This framework was evaluated using real patient data from an electronic health record. Such an AI framework easily outperforms the current treatment-as-usual (TAU) case-rate/fee-for-service models of healthcare (Cost per Unit Change: 189 vs. 497) while obtaining a 30-35% increase in patient outcomes. Tweaking certain model parameters further enhances this advantage, obtaining roughly 50% more improvement for roughly half the costs. Given careful design and problem formulation, an AI simulation framework can approximate optimal decisions even in complex and uncertain environments. Future work is described that outlines potential lines of research and integration of machine learning algorithms for personalized medicine.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Jan 2013.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2023Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Modelscited by 102
- 2021Sequential Deconfounding for Causal Inference with Unobserved Confounderscited by 24
- 2022On the convex formulations of robust Markov decision processescited by 8
- 2022Training Novices: The Role of Human-AI Collaboration and Knowledge Transfercited by 5
- 2024Counterfactual Influence in Markov Decision Processescited by 4
- 2025A Bit of Freedom Goes a Long Way: Classical and Quantum Algorithms for Reinforcement Learning under a Generative Modelcited by 1
- 2021An Analysis of Reinforcement Learning for Malaria Controlcited by 0
- 2026Improved Quantum Algorithms for Reinforcement Learning Under a Generative Modelcited by 0
- 2026Improved Quantum Algorithms for Reinforcement Learning Under a Generative Model3 Aug 2026
- 2025A Bit of Freedom Goes a Long Way: Classical and Quantum Algorithms for Reinforcement Learning under a Generative Model30 Jul 2025
- 2024Counterfactual Influence in Markov Decision Processes13 Feb 2024
- 2023Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Models5 Feb 2023
- 2022On the convex formulations of robust Markov decision processes21 Sep 2022
- 2022Training Novices: The Role of Human-AI Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer1 Jul 2022
- 2021An Analysis of Reinforcement Learning for Malaria Control19 Jul 2021
- 2021Sequential Deconfounding for Causal Inference with Unobserved Confounders16 Apr 2021