mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

IneqAgent: Agentic Inequality Proving in Lean with Symbolic Computation

arXiv 2610.20681 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Educational agents and math problem solving also fits: Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Formal inequality proving requires mathematical reasoning and exact computation, often connected through intermediate lemmas and goal reformulations. We introduce IneqAgent, an agentic framework combining LLM reasoning with symbolic computation for inequality proving in Lean4. Lemma-level Monte Carlo Tree Search coordinates lemma construction, goal reformulation, and symbolic backend selection. Complementary sum-of-squares, Bernstein, and successive difference-substitution backends produce exact certificates for local Lean proof generation. The agent integrates these proofs with LLM-generated steps and uses Lean feedback to construct complete proofs checked against the original theorem statements. On four benchmarks, IneqAgent with DeepSeek-V4-Flash solves 175 of 186 problems (94.09%), achieving the highest overall success rate among the evaluated methods. Across four backbones, it achieves higher success rates at low LLM inference cost thresholds than Direct Agent using the same backbone, with lower mean inference costs over each method's successful runs. We also obtain Lean-verified strengthenings of Dittert's conjecture in dimensions four and five, and certify the Holens--Djokovic (4,4) inequality, implying Merris's conjecture in dimension four.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Educational agents and math problem solving, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Discover and Prove: An Open-source Agentic Framework for Hard Mode Automated Theorem Proving in Lean 4
  2. 2026ProofLoom: Proof-Obligation-Driven Theory Construction for Autoformalizing Research-Level Stochastic Optimization
  3. 2026LEAP: Supercharging LLMs for Formal Mathematics with Agentic Frameworks
  4. 2026Optimizing the Cost-Quality Tradeoff of Agentic Theorem Provers in Lean
  5. 2025Ineq-Comp: Benchmarking Human-Intuitive Compositional Reasoning in Automated Theorem Proving on Inequalities
  6. 2025APOLLO: Automated LLM and Lean Collaboration for Advanced Formal Reasoning
  7. 2026OProver: A Unified Framework for Agentic Formal Theorem Proving
  8. 2026SorryDB: Can AI Provers Complete Real-World Lean Theorems?