Manac'a-1B-Instruct-2: Reproducible Safety Alignment for a Native Brazilian-Portuguese LLM. Negative DPO Results, a Controlled Composition Scan, and a Silent Failure Mode of the LLM Judge
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks
Abstract (arXiv)
Brazilian Portuguese remains underserved by open-source language models, and the few that are safety-aligned rarely document what did not work or validate comparisons with statistical significance. We present Manac'a-1B-Instruct-2, the second-generation post-training alignment of Manac'a-1B (1.72B parameters, trained from scratch for PT-BR), with an SFT corpus of 291,223 examples. We document three DPO attempts, all negative, including a case where the training reward margin reaches 1.0 while free generation does not change at all, and show that safety came from a dedicated safety-SFT (LLM-jp AnswerCarefully style), refined over three iterations until closing the safety-helpfulness frontier. A controlled scan of the fraction of general data in the safety-SFT mix (10% to 60%) reveals a non-monotonic over-refusal curve with a knee point at 40-50%. The final model is compared against four external PT-BR models on the same items, with Wilson confidence intervals and paired McNemar tests with Holm-Bonferroni correction: the lower bound of its safety interval (94.1%) lies above the upper bound of all four baselines. We also report a methodological finding for LLM-judge evaluation: on two of six safety items in MT-Bench-PT, the judge categorically refuses to assign a score regardless of the evaluated response, silently reducing the effective N of that category in every prior report of the project. We complement this with an n-gram decontamination check and a Chinchilla-anchored compute-budget table that attributes the gap in general capability to pre-training scale rather than alignment methodology. All code, raw data, logs, and scripts that produce every reported number are publicly released.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 10 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2026.
Builds on
10 of 12 references.
References · 10
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2024LLM-jp: A Cross-organizational Project for the Research and Development of Fully Open Japanese LLMscited by 33
- 2025Know Thy Judge: On the Robustness Meta-Evaluation of LLM Safety Judgescited by 24
- 2024TeenyTinyLlama: open-source tiny language models trained in Brazilian Portuguesecited by 13
- 2024Tucano: Advancing Neural Text Generation for Portuguesecited by 13
- 2025AI vs. Human Judgment of Content Moderation: LLM-as-a-Judge and Ethics-Based Response Refusalscited by 5
- 2026How Sensitive Are Safety Benchmarks to Judge Configuration Choices?cited by 5
- 2026Tucano 2 Cool: Better Open Source LLMs for Portuguesecited by 4
- 2026LLM Judges Inconsistently Disagree Across Safety Criteria and Harm Categoriescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Picky LLMs and Unreliable RMs: An Empirical Study on Safety Alignment after Instruction Tuning
- 2026IndicSafe: A Benchmark for Evaluating Multilingual LLM Safety in South Asia
- 2023Fake Alignment: Are LLMs Really Aligned Well?
- 2025SafeLawBench: Towards Safe Alignment of Large Language Models
- 2024Superficial Safety Alignment Hypothesis
- 2024Safety Arithmetic: A Framework for Test-time Safety Alignment of Language Models by Steering Parameters and Activations
- 2025Refining Positive and Toxic Samples for Dual Safety Self-Alignment of LLMs with Minimal Human Interventions
- 2026LLM Safety Alignment in Low-Resource Languages: A Systematic Literature Review