mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Scaling Multilingual Safety and Reasoning Evaluation through Reasoning-Guided Translation

arXiv 2610.20221 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation also fits: Reasoning for agents, planning and code

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed across languages, yet their safety and reasoning capabilities remain predominantly evaluated in English. Translating existing benchmarks offers a scalable approach to multilingual evaluation, but preserving task-specific meaning across languages presents significant challenges, particularly for harmful requests, mathematical reasoning, and conversational interactions. We introduce a reasoning-guided translation framework for constructing multilingual evaluations designed to preserve the structure and intended meaning of diverse benchmark tasks. Our approach separates translation strategy selection from large-scale generation, combining reasoning-guided configuration selection with task-aware validation, targeted repair, and independent quality screening. Using this framework, we develop a source-aligned evaluation collection spanning seven safety, conversational, and mathematical reasoning resources across 11 languages. The resulting collection achieves 99.94% coverage of intended item--language pairs in the two subsets requiring repair. Evaluations of open-source LLMs reveal distinct language-dependent vulnerabilities, including inconsistent refusal behaviour and substantial reasoning degradation in lower-resource languages. These findings highlight the importance of task-sensitive benchmark construction and systematic quality assessment for understanding multilingual model behaviour beyond English.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 13 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2026.

Builds on

13 of 28 references.

References · 13

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
  3. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
  4. 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,312
  5. 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,045
  6. 2023Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Searchcited by 653
  7. 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 629
  8. 2020Language-agnostic BERT Sentence Embeddingcited by 627
  9. 2022CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 207
  10. 2025The State of Multilingual LLM Safety Research: From Measuring the Language Gap to Mitigating Itcited by 45
  11. 2025Linguistic Generalizability of Test-Time Scaling in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 37
  12. 2025MMATH: A Multilingual Benchmark for Mathematical Reasoningcited by 17
1 more
  1. 2025MuBench: Assessment of Multilingual Capabilities of Large Language Models Across 61 Languagescited by 15

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Language Matters: How Do Multilingual Input and Reasoning Paths Affect Large Reasoning Models?
  2. 2025Why Do Multilingual Reasoning Gaps Emerge in Reasoning Language Models?
  3. 2026BabelSteering: Multilingual Safety Alignment via English Steering Vectors
  4. 2025A Comprehensive Evaluation of Multilingual Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: Performance, Consistency, and Faithfulness Across Languages
  5. 2025A Survey of Multilingual Reasoning in Language Models
  6. 2023All Languages Matter: On the Multilingual Safety of Large Language Models
  7. 2024Eliciting Better Multilingual Structured Reasoning from LLMs through Code
  8. 2026Rethinking the Multilingual Reasoning Gap with Layer Swap