Typed Decision Models on Tabular Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Typed decision models are language models that answer a question with a fixed set of possible answers by returning a probability for each answer instead of generating text. We study them on tabular data and compare four decision models with three large language models (LLMs) on row classification, fact verification and anomaly detection. Every request is sent in its original form and under 21 types of rewrite that keep its content, such as renaming the options or writing the table in another format. The decision models perform as well as the LLMs at a lower cost. Three of them are also far more robust to how the question is formulated. No model we test is robust to how the table is organized. For every model, at least a third of the row decisions change under some rewrite of the table or the question. The decisions to which a decision model gives low probability are the ones most likely to change. Decision models are a practical choice for tabular decisions, but their robustness remains an open problem.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2026.
Builds on
24 of 43 references.
References · 24
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,392
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
- 2023Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingcited by 817
- 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 491
- 2023Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectorscited by 486
- 2019TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact Verificationcited by 428
- 2023State of What Art? A Call for Multi-Prompt LLM Evaluationcited by 310
- 2019Predictive Multiplicity in Classificationcited by 166
- 2024Large Language Models(LLMs) on Tabular Data: Prediction, Generation, and Understanding -- A Surveycited by 159
- 2022LIFT: Language-Interfaced Fine-Tuning for Non-Language Machine Learning Taskscited by 148
12 more
- 2024Large Language Models Can Automatically Engineer Features for Few-Shot Tabular Learningcited by 81
- 2024Large Scale Transfer Learning for Tabular Data via Language Modelingcited by 76
- 2023RobuT: A Systematic Study of Table QA Robustness Against Human-Annotated Adversarial Perturbationscited by 43
- 2021On the Reproducibility of Neural Network Predictionscited by 29
- 2024FREB-TQA: A Fine-Grained Robustness Evaluation Benchmark for Table Question Answeringcited by 16
- 2026JevAdvBench: A Benchmark and Black-Box Attacks for Reinforcement Learning for Calibrated Decisions Modelscited by 10
- 2025LLM Meeting Decision Trees on Tabular Datacited by 8
- 2024Quantifying Prediction Consistency Under Fine-Tuning Multiplicity in Tabular LLMscited by 6
- 2026LLM-as-Jev: LLMs Are Already Jev-Style Decision Models -- When and How to Fine-Tune Themcited by 4
- 2025ReTabAD: A Benchmark for Restoring Semantic Context in Tabular Anomaly Detectioncited by 3
- 2026Rethinking Hallucinations: Correctness, Consistency, and Prompt Multiplicitycited by 2
- 2026Where Can a Decision Model Diagnose HVAC Faults? Reasoning Demand, Physical Representation, and Robustness Under Shiftcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.