mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond the Trial-and-Error Loop: Hybrid Projection and Automated Tuning for Distributed Training

arXiv 2610.19423 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2026cs.AI cs.DCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Configuring distributed LLM training across hundreds of GPUs requires jointly optimizing tensor, pipeline, expert, context, and data parallelism alongside micro-batch size, recomputation, sharding, and overlap, a combinatorial space where memory legality can hinge on a single byte of activation accounting. Today, teams navigate it through expensive multi-node trial and error, burning GPU-hours on crashes and suboptimal recipes. We present Primus Projection, which closes this loop with two coupled components. First, a hybrid projection engine that measures what it can and simulates what it cannot: GPU microbenchmarks on as few as a single device capture compute kernels and any in-scope communication; a sub-node downscale-measure-upscale workflow analytically restores out-of-scope collectives, FSDP overlap, and the full pipeline schedule at the multi-node target. A pure simulation mode runs entirely on CPU, enabling pre-silicon planning without any GPU. Second, the Primus Tuning Agent treats the projection engine as a fast scoring oracle (seconds per candidate instead of tens of minutes) and uses it to drive an intelligent search over the configuration space. A deterministic seed planner sweeps single axes; an LLM investigation loop proposes cross-axis combinations the planner cannot reach, with an analytic memory pre-filter that rejects infeasible candidates before any GPU time is spent. Validated on Llama 3.1 (dense) and Mixtral 8x22B (MoE) across two GPU generations, all projections stay within ~10% of measured multi-node throughput, and fidelity holds at production scale: 4.7% error on DeepSeek V3 671B at 1,024 GPUs and 1.9% on Qwen3-235B-A22B at 256 GPUs. In a Mixtral 8x22B case study, the Primus Tuning Agent discovers a configuration delivering +27% throughput over the published 4-node BF16 reference at the same scale, in under 30 minutes of single-node exploration.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2026.

Builds on

17 of 33 references.

References · 17

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  3. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  4. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,073
  5. 2019Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelismcited by 1,868
  6. 2020GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic Shardingcited by 1,631
  7. 2021Efficient Large-Scale Language Model Training on GPU Clusters Using Megatron-LMcited by 632
  8. 2024FlashAttention-3: Fast and Accurate Attention with Asynchrony and Low-precisioncited by 519
  9. 2022MegaBlocks: Efficient Sparse Training with Mixture-of-Expertscited by 209
  10. 2018Beyond Data and Model Parallelism for Deep Neural Networkscited by 179
  11. 2024Large Language Models to Enhance Bayesian Optimizationcited by 135
  12. 2024Large Language Model Agent for Hyper-Parameter Optimizationcited by 64
5 more
  1. 2022Galvatron: Efficient Transformer Training over Multiple GPUs Using Automatic Parallelismcited by 53
  2. 2023Improving Automatic Parallel Training via Balanced Memory Workload Optimizationcited by 14
  3. 2023Proteus: Simulating the Performance of Distributed DNN Trainingcited by 10
  4. 2025Lumos: Efficient Performance Modeling and Estimation for Large-scale LLM Trainingcited by 7
  5. 2025tritonBLAS: Triton-based Analytical Approach for GEMM Kernel Parameter Selectioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026FastKernels: Benchmarking GPU Kernel Generation in Production
  2. 2026AMDKernelVault: Large-Scale Datasets and Agentic Training for AMD GPU Kernel Optimization
  3. 2025RAPID-LLM: Resilience-Aware Performance analysis of Infrastructure for Distributed LLM Training and Inference ↗
  4. 2026Scaling LLM Inference Beyond Amdahl`s Limits via Eliminating Non-Scalable Overheads ↗
  5. 2026D2K-Bench: Can LLM Agents Turn Expert Designs into Efficient GPU Kernels?
  6. 2026CuTeGen: An LLM-Based Agentic Framework for Generation and Optimization of High-Performance GPU Kernels using CuTe
  7. 2026Automated Tensor Scheduling for Hybrid CPU-GPU LLM Inference on Consumer Devices
  8. 2025GPU Kernel Scientist: An LLM-Driven Framework for Iterative Kernel Optimization