mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Tiny Recursive Message Passing

arXiv 2610.18649 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Message passing neural networks have shown remarkable performance in algorithmic and constraint reasoning, due to their ability to encode the structure of the task directly in the architecture. Recent work has shown that better results can be achieved using recursive transformers trained with deep supervision and truncated recursions, which make extremely deep loops stable to train, and equipped with test-time procedures such as discrete deduction lattices. In this work, we apply the same procedures to message passing networks, and show that the two ingredients are complementary, and lead to parameter efficient models: we obtain about 99% test accuracy on Sudoku-Extreme with a model of 16k parameters that trains in about 10 minutes on an H100, or in 9 hours on a CPU. We further show that the cost of truncating gradients grows with the number of rounds information needs to cross the graph, making the choice of wiring a trade-off between robustness to truncation and transfer across problem sizes. We conclude by showing that our models transfer zero-shot to larger instances than those seen during training, outperforming popular neural baselines on N-queens and Boolean satisfiability with a fraction of their parameters.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2026.

Builds on

32 of 40 references.

References · 32

  1. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,487
  2. 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,367
  3. 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,694
  4. 2017Deep Setscited by 1,421
  5. 2015Gated Graph Sequence Neural Networkscited by 796
  6. 2019Heterogeneous Graph Attention Networkcited by 734
  7. 2019Deep Equilibrium Modelscited by 615
  8. 2016Adaptive Computation Time for Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 506
  9. 2018Invariant and Equivariant Graph Networkscited by 346
  10. 2019What graph neural networks cannot learn: depth vs widthcited by 201
  11. 2018Learning a SAT Solver from Single-Bit Supervisioncited by 200
  12. 2025Hierarchical Reasoning Modelcited by 177
20 more
  1. 2019What Can Neural Networks Reason About?cited by 159
  2. 2020Multiscale Deep Equilibrium Modelscited by 151
  3. 2021Can You Learn an Algorithm? Generalizing from Easy to Hard Problems with Recurrent Networkscited by 117
  4. 2020Implicit Graph Neural Networkscited by 100
  5. 2017Recurrent Relational Networkscited by 72
  6. 2019Approximation Ratios of Graph Neural Networks for Combinatorial Problemscited by 69
  7. 2020Neural Enhanced Belief Propagation on Factor Graphscited by 57
  8. 2020Belief Propagation Neural Networkscited by 33
  9. 2021Goal-Aware Neural SAT Solvercited by 28
  10. 2026Probabilistic Tiny Recursive Modelcited by 19
  11. 2023G4SATBench: Benchmarking and Advancing SAT Solving with Graph Neural Networkscited by 18
  12. 2026Equilibrium Reasoners: Learning Attractors Enables Scalable Reasoningcited by 18
  13. 2023Factor Graph Neural Networkscited by 15
  14. 2020Neural Learning of One-of-Many Solutions for Combinatorial Problems in Structured Output Spacescited by 14
  15. 2021Implicit vs Unfolded Graph Neural Networkscited by 13
  16. 2024Deep Equilibrium Algorithmic Reasoningcited by 6
  17. 2026Symbol-Equivariant Recurrent Reasoning Modelscited by 4
  18. 2026Lattice Deduction Transformerscited by 3
  19. 2026Benchmarking Graph Neural Networks in Solving Hard Constraint Satisfaction Problemscited by 2
  20. 2026Adaptive Recurrent Message Passing for Test Time Computing on Graphscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.