Random Probing for Structural Self-Interactions in Graph Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) fundamentally lack the ability to capture structural properties defined by node self-interactions, such as cycle counts, subgraph centrality, and heat kernel signatures. Existing solutions often rely on computationally expensive higher-order architectures or hand-crafted features. In this work, we introduce DIAL, a message-passing layer that gives nodes access to graph structure through the diagonal of graph-derived operators. Our approach uses randomized probing to provide nodes with learnable, permutation equivariant access to diagonal entries. We prove that our approach can express important structural features, including cycle counts, subgraph centrality, and heat kernel signatures. The proposed method can be integrated directly into message passing layers. Experiments on molecular property prediction, cycle counting, and pattern detection demonstrate the effectiveness of DIAL across a range of graph learning tasks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2026.
Builds on
28 of 38 references.
References · 28
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,089
- 2013Spectral Networks and Locally Connected Networks on Graphscited by 1,102
- 2018Weisfeiler and Leman Go Neural: Higher-order Graph Neural Networkscited by 881
- 2020Benchmarking Graph Neural Networkscited by 680
- 2019Provably Powerful Graph Networkscited by 389
- 2018Invariant and Equivariant Graph Networkscited by 346
- 2020Improving Graph Neural Network Expressivity via Subgraph Isomorphism Countingcited by 313
- 2020Can Graph Neural Networks Count Substructures?cited by 236
- 2020The Surprising Power of Graph Neural Networks with Random Node Initializationcited by 198
- 2021Identity-aware Graph Neural Networkscited by 198
16 more
- 2022Sign and Basis Invariant Networks for Spectral Graph Representation Learningcited by 179
- 2021From Stars to Subgraphs: Uplifting Any GNN with Local Structure Awarenesscited by 155
- 2019On the Universality of Invariant Networkscited by 152
- 2021Nested Graph Neural Networkscited by 137
- 2021DropGNN: Random Dropouts Increase the Expressiveness of Graph Neural Networkscited by 118
- 2020Building powerful and equivariant graph neural networks with structural message-passingcited by 97
- 2022Boosting the Cycle Counting Power of Graph Neural Networks with I2-GNNscited by 56
- 2019Coloring graph neural networks for node disambiguationcited by 52
- 2023Realistic Synthetic Financial Transactions for Anti-Money Laundering Modelscited by 50
- 2022A Theoretical Comparison of Graph Neural Network Extensionscited by 48
- 2023On the Stability of Expressive Positional Encodings for Graphscited by 33
- 2023Graph Positional Encoding via Random Feature Propagationcited by 31
- 2023Provably Powerful Graph Neural Networks for Directed Multigraphscited by 27
- 2025Learning Efficient Positional Encodings with Graph Neural Networkscited by 24
- 2023Distance-Restricted Folklore Weisfeiler-Leman GNNs with Provable Cycle Counting Powercited by 12
- 2024Expressivity and Generalization: Fragment-Biases for Molecular GNNscited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.