mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning Operators for Symmetry Discovery: From Lie Groups to Local Symmetry Geometry

arXiv 2610.16884 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Continuous symmetry discovery is typically formulated as a separate estimation problem for each function or dataset. We instead investigate whether the map from a function to its symmetry structure can be learned across a family of functions from finite observations. Using the infinitesimal differential characterization of continuous symmetries, we formulate this map as an inverse symmetry operator, analogous to an inverse PDE problem. For global Lie-group symmetries, we establish a representation-theoretic population characterization: the symmetry Lie algebra is the nullspace of a positive-semidefinite operator constructed from representation coefficients and the infinitesimal group action. We also show that the inverse symmetry operator is equivariant under coordinate changes through the adjoint action. This characterization separates the geometric symmetry map from finite-sample estimation, motivating a hybrid approach that amortizes statistically difficult components while retaining analytic structure. On SO(5) benchmarks, amortized equivariant estimation of harmonic coefficients improves symmetry recovery from sparse observations, whereas ordinary least squares suffices for SL(2,R). We extend this viewpoint to local symmetries, where symmetry directions form smoothly varying tangent distributions rather than a fixed Lie algebra. Under the Lie-bracket consistency condition, Frobenius' theorem guarantees local integral submanifolds along which observables remain unchanged. We recover this geometry using a hybrid estimator that learns observation weights while preserving analytic differential and geometric recovery. Across global, non-compact, local, and physically motivated synthetic benchmarks, our results support learning the statistically difficult finite-sample components while preserving the known geometric structure of symmetry recovery.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2026.

Builds on

11 of 16 references.

References · 11

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  2. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
  3. 2020Incorporating Symmetry into Deep Dynamics Models for Improved Generalizationcited by 126
  4. 2021Automatic Symmetry Discovery with Lie Algebra Convolutional Networkcited by 83
  5. 2022Lie Point Symmetry Data Augmentation for Neural PDE Solverscited by 77
  6. 2020Meta-Learning Symmetries by Reparameterizationcited by 76
  7. 2023Generative Adversarial Symmetry Discoverycited by 42
  8. 2022LieGG: Studying Learned Lie Group Generatorscited by 31
  9. 2024Symmetry Discovery Beyond Affine Transformationscited by 15
  10. 2025Explicit Discovery of Nonlinear Symmetries from Dynamic Datacited by 6
  11. 2025AtlasD: Automatic Local Symmetry Discoverycited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.