Hidden in Plain Sight: Advancing Harmful Content Understanding via Perception-Aware Adversarial Self-Play
On the map: Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs → Safety of self-evolving systems
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite significant advances in language understanding, Large Language Models (LLMs) can still miss meaning hidden in plain sight, failing to identify harmful intent in expressions readily understood by humans. Malicious users exploit this gap by strategically disguising harmful content to evade automated moderation, posing a serious threat to online platform safety. The vulnerability reflects a fundamental cognitive asymmetry between human readers, who integrate contextual, phonetic, and visual cues to decipher the intent behind deliberate obfuscation, and text-based LLMs, which rely primarily on token sequences and have limited exposure to evolving evasions. To bridge this asymmetry, we propose PASP (Perception-Aware Adversarial Self-Play), which combines multi-perceptual views with adversarial self-play to improve understanding of harmful intent as evasions evolve. Specifically, PASP constructs textual, phonetic, and visual views of each input, preserving its original context while exposing pronunciation and glyph cues obscured in token space. During adversarial self-play, an attacker uses defender feedback to generate intent-preserving evasions, while the defender is trained using an intent-invariance reward to understand harmful intent across changing surface forms. Extensive experiments show that PASP reduces adaptive attack success rates by up to 73.71% and 74.49% on ChineseHarm-Bench and EvoHarmBench, respectively, preserves model capabilities with minimal degradation, and effectively interprets real-world evasive expressions in e-commerce.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety of self-evolving systems, one of 13 directions in Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2026.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026What the Eyes See, the LLMs Miss: Exploiting Human Perception for Adversarial Text Attacks
- 2026Truth Lies Deep: Countering Semantic Camouflage via Latent Intent Verification
- 2025Playing Devil's Advocate: Unmasking Toxicity and Vulnerabilities in Large Vision-Language Models
- 2026Harmfulness Propagation Dynamics: Layer-wise Trajectories of Adversarial Intent in Large Language Models
- 2026Verifying Intent and Harm: A Unified Defense Against LLM-Generated Threats
- 2026Render Before Reading: Visual Rendering as a Prompt Injection Defense
- 2025Exploring the Secondary Risks of Large Language Models
- 2025Concealment of Intent: A Game-Theoretic Analysis