Automated carotid artery atherosclerotic inflammation segmentation in PET using MSR-Net
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Objective. To develop an automated method for segmentation and uptake quantification of carotid atherosclerotic inflammation on 64Cu-CANF-comb PET while accounting for partial-volume and tissue-fraction effects. Approach. Synthetic carotid PET images with known fractional-volume ground truth were generated by combining MR-derived high-resolution activity maps with GATE Monte Carlo simulation incorporating major PET physical processes and matched to the Biograph mMR acquisition and reconstruction. A two-stage network first localized the carotid vessel wall from T1-weighted MR and then estimated voxel-wise inflammation fraction from masked PET. Both stages used a multiscale residual (MSR) convolutional backbone. Performance was compared with U-Net, Transformer U-Net, DUCK-Net, and iterative Yang partial-volume correction. Main results. In a two-alternative forced-choice study, five nuclear-medicine physicians identified real images with 54% accuracy (54/100; Wilson 95% CI 0.44-0.63; exact binomial p = 0.48). On 184 simulated test slices from five held-out patients, the proposed method achieved a weighted DSC of 0.79, compared with 0.73 for U-Net, 0.69 for Transformer U-Net, and 0.75 for DUCK-Net, with corresponding HD values of 1.85, 2.29, 2.32, and 2.23 voxels. Patient-cluster bootstrap comparisons favored the proposed method for DSC and HD against all three baselines (Holm-corrected p <= 0.031). Overall ENRMSE was 0.24 versus 0.59, 0.68, and 0.59 for the three DL baselines and 0.57 for iterative Yang. In seven patients, corrected SUV showed a positive association with MR-derived lipid-rich/necrotic core with hemorrhage. Significance. The proposed framework improved carotid PET segmentation and uptake quantification under simulated conditions. The patient analysis is preliminary and requires external validation with biological reference standards before clinical deployment.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2026.
Builds on
9 of 58 references.
References · 9
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2021Efficient Training of Visual Transformers with Small Datasetscited by 108
- 2023Using DUCK-Net for Polyp Image Segmentationcited by 31
- 2022Bridging the Gap Between Vision Transformers and Convolutional Neural Networks on Small Datasetscited by 29
- 2021Objective task-based evaluation of artificial intelligence-based medical imaging methods: Framework, strategies and role of the physiciancited by 16
- 2020A Physics-Guided Modular Deep-Learning Based Automated Framework for Tumor Segmentation in PET Imagescited by 7
- 2020A Bayesian approach to tissue-fraction estimation for oncological PET segmentationcited by 4
- 2021Observer study-based evaluation of a stochastic and physics-based method to generate oncological PET imagescited by 2
- 2021A tissue-fraction estimation-based segmentation method for quantitative dopamine transporter SPECTcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.