RegExtract: A Benchmark for PFAS Regulatory Information Extraction with LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Extracting structured information from regulatory documents is a critical but challenging task. Relevant facts are scattered across long, legally dense texts, and traceability of extracted facts to their source is essential for verification. With increasing awareness of the environmental and health impacts of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), regulatory documents have expanded significantly, varying in scope and product relevance, making interpretation challenging for manufacturers and policymakers. We introduce RegExtract, a benchmark for structured information extraction from PFAS regulatory documents, comprising 488 human-annotated field instances across 20 US state documents and 46 regulations. Each field instance includes a value and a provenance entry, yielding 976 entries in total. We define a typed, multi-field schema targeting key elements such as material definitions, permitted uses, and product exemptions, and propose provenance-aware evaluation metrics tailored to regulatory text. Through experiments with open- and closed-source LLMs across prompting strategies, document condensing methods, and schema partitioning approaches, we find that document identification fields remain challenging, and that field-specific few-shot examples improve extraction. This work lays the groundwork for AI tools for hazardous substance identification, question answering, and compliance monitoring. The code and data are available at https://github.com/IBM/PFAS-regulations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2026.
Builds on
15 of 34 references.
References · 15
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
- 2023LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 336
- 2021CUAD: An Expert-Annotated NLP Dataset for Legal Contract Reviewcited by 236
- 2023Large Language Models for Generative Information Extraction: A Surveycited by 185
- 2024RQ-RAG: Learning to Refine Queries for Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 147
- 2025Docling: An Efficient Open-Source Toolkit for AI-driven Document Conversioncited by 63
- 2018LexNLP: Natural language processing and information extraction for legal and regulatory textscited by 28
- 2024ChunkRAG: Novel LLM-Chunk Filtering Method for RAG Systemscited by 23
Built on by
Not cited yet.