Retraining-Free Depth Pruning of Vision Transformers: A Cross Domain Study of Layer Redundancy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Transformer architectures have achieved strong results in natural language processing and computer vision, but their deployment is limited by high computational, memory and storage costs, motivating research into model compression techniques, such as pruning, while preserving performance. Prior work has shown substantial redundancy in large language models (LLMs), and redundancy in vision transformers has also been investigated, but it remains less systematically analyzed than in LLMs. In this work, we extend similarity-based redundancy analysis to vision models by measuring cosine similarity between layer inputs and outputs to identify transformations with minimal impact. We study redundancy patterns across several transformer architectures and find that deep vision transformers such as DINOv2 and SwinV2, like language models, exhibit significant redundancy. We then evaluate how this redundancy can be exploited to improve efficiency, analyzing the trade-off between inference speed and performance degradation under different pruning strategies. Our results show that moderate pruning can yield substantial acceleration with limited impact on accuracy, and that 20% of the DINOv2 blocks can be removed without any retraining, for a 1.24x throughput gain and a 20% lower energy per image at a relative accuracy loss below 1% on ImageNet-1K. We further propose a model selection pipeline that automatically identifies the best pruned configuration for a given dataset, reducing FLOPs by 13% to 27% on average across architectures with an average accuracy change between -0.3 and +1.0 points.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2026.
Builds on
40 of 58 references.
References · 40
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
- 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
- 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,919
- 2016Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNetscited by 1,143
- 2022Token Merging: Your ViT But Fastercited by 1,021
- 2022LLM.int8(): 8-bit Matrix Multiplication for Transformers at Scalecited by 906
- 2021DynamicViT: Efficient Vision Transformers with Dynamic Token Sparsificationcited by 864
- 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 800
28 more
- 2024ShortGPT: Layers in Large Language Models are More Redundant Than You Expectcited by 383
- 2022Not All Patches are What You Need: Expediting Vision Transformers via Token Reorganizationscited by 363
- 2024The Unreasonable Ineffectiveness of the Deeper Layerscited by 226
- 2021Chasing Sparsity in Vision Transformers: An End-to-End Explorationcited by 183
- 2024What Matters in Transformers? Not All Attention is Neededcited by 84
- 2021Vision Transformer Pruningcited by 79
- 2023X-Pruner: eXplainable Pruning for Vision Transformerscited by 68
- 2021A Comprehensive Survey on Hardware-Aware Neural Architecture Searchcited by 61
- 2015WHOI-Plankton- A Large Scale Fine Grained Visual Recognition Benchmark Dataset for Plankton Classificationcited by 18
- 2024MLP Can Be A Good Transformer Learnercited by 17
- 2024LPViT: Low-Power Semi-structured Pruning for Vision Transformerscited by 16
- 2025ReplaceMe: Network Simplification via Depth Pruning and Transformer Block Linearizationcited by 13
- 2018Tree Species Identification from Bark Images Using Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 11
- 2024Preserving Deep Representations In One-Shot Pruning: A Hessian-Free Second-Order Optimization Frameworkcited by 11
- 2021Deep Learning Classification of Lake Zooplanktoncited by 9
- 2024Dense Vision Transformer Compression with Few Samplescited by 9
- 2024DAPlankton: Benchmark Dataset for Multi-instrument Plankton Recognition via Fine-grained Domain Adaptationcited by 5
- 2025Variance-Based Pruning for Accelerating and Compressing Trained Networkscited by 5
- 2025Elastic ViTs from Pretrained Models without Retrainingcited by 4
- 2024TOAST: Transformer Optimization using Adaptive and Simple Transformationscited by 3
- 2025Entropy-Based Block Pruning for Efficient Large Language Modelscited by 3
- 2026Structural Pruning of Large Vision Language Models: A Comprehensive Study on Pruning Dynamics, Recovery, and Data Efficiencycited by 3
- 2026CORP: Closed-Form One-shot Representation-Preserving Structured Pruning for Transformerscited by 2
- 2026FlattenGPT: Depth Compression for Transformer with Layer Flatteningcited by 2
- 2026SIMPLER: Efficient Foundation Model Adaptation via Similarity-Guided Layer Pruning for Earth Observationcited by 2
- 2026GradMAP: Faster Layer Pruning with Gradient Metric and Projection Compensationcited by 1
- 2026GRAIL: Post-hoc Compensation by Linear Reconstruction for Compressed Networkscited by 1
- 2026Rethinking Depth Pruning for Vision Transformers: A Heterogeneity-Aware Perspectivecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.