PRISM: Precision Forcing for Generalist Vision-Language-Action Policies
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models
also in 2 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Coupling a pretrained vision-language model (VLM) with a diffusion or flow-matching action expert has become the mainstream vision-language-action (VLA) paradigm for embodied policies, yet they remain unreliable once a task demands precise manipulation, e.g., submillimeter cable insertion. We attribute this weakness to a training objective that averages flow-matching errors across contexts and flow times, allocating little supervision to the few decisive moments determining task success. Along the generative path, inference integrates a locally supervised velocity field, so equally penalized errors at different flow times can affect the executed action unequally. Consequently, precision-task performance deteriorates as physical tolerance tightens by orders of magnitude. We call this supervision imbalance across contexts and flow times Flow-Time Starvation. The remedy is to jointly align supervision allocation and representation learning with context-dependent precision demand, enabling the policy to recognize when greater precision is needed. We instantiate this precision-forcing strategy as Precision-aware Reweighting and Internalization for Skilled Manipulation (PRISM), which scores precision demand offline, strengthens flow supervision where errors are consequential and action signals are visible, and internalizes that demand in the VLM condition representation. Simulation and real-robot experiments show that PRISM preserves or improves general-task performance while raising mean end-to-end success from 38.3% to 86.7% across drive connector insertion, bimanual connector mating, and screw tightening, substantially extending the precision boundary of existing embodied policies without new sensors or observation modalities.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Grounded Semantic Re-Binding for Robust Instruction Generalization in Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2026RoVLA: Multi-Consistency Constraints for Robust Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2026TEMPO: Semantic-Action Decoupled RL Post-Training for Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2026LangForce: Bayesian Decomposition of Vision Language Action Models via Latent Action Queries
- 2026Scaling Verification Can Be More Effective than Scaling Policy Learning for Vision-Language-Action Alignment
- 2026APT: Action Expert Pretraining Improves Instruction Generalization of Vision-Language-Action Policies
- 2026Potential-Guided Flow Matching for Vision-Language-Action Policy Improvement
- 2026Rethinking Visual-Language-Action Model Scaling: Alignment, Mixture, and Regularization