mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Constrained Probabilistic Numerics: Gaussian Process Solvers for Linear PDEs under Linear Inequality Constraints

arXiv 2610.13804 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2026stat.ML cs.LG cs.NAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Gaussian process solvers for linear partial differential equations (PDEs) return posteriors rather than point estimates, but they condition only on equality information: the PDE residual, boundary data, and measurements. Many solutions of interest also obey inequality constraints, including nonnegativity, monotonicity, and absence of arbitrage, which equality conditioning cannot enforce. We prove that conditioning a Gaussian process prior jointly on linear equality observations and a finite-dimensional inequality event is equivalent to conditioning sequentially in terms of Borel measures on the solution space. The physics-informed posterior is therefore a valid prior for the inequality update at virtual points. The combined law is non-Gaussian yet computable through truncated-Gaussian moments, and neither the PDE conditioning nor the inequality update requires modification. We evaluated the construction on a Poisson benchmark, option-price surfaces, and air-quality fields. Under incomplete boundary data, a monotonicity constraint lowered the error of a two-dimensional Poisson reconstruction by 63%. On a real S&P 500 option chain thinned to 20 retained quotes, no-arbitrage constraints reduced held-out extrapolation error by 22% and cut the calendar-arbitrage rate from 10% to 1%. On four real air-quality snapshots, nonnegativity reduced a Gaussian moment-based sub-zero-tail proxy by 74% at the sparsest monitor count. Changes in mean accuracy and constraint diagnostics differed across data regimes. The probability of the noisy virtual constraint event under the equality posterior measures agreement with the specified bounds before the update. The construction turns admissibility from a post-processing step into conditioning information for probabilistic PDE solvers.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2026.

Builds on

13 of 26 references.

References · 13

  1. 2021Physics-informed neural networks with hard constraints for inverse designcited by 280
  2. 2017Machine Learning of Linear Differential Equations using Gaussian Processescited by 140
  3. 2021Solving and Learning Nonlinear PDEs with Gaussian Processescited by 129
  4. 2015Probabilistic Numerics and Uncertainty in Computationscited by 60
  5. 2020A Survey of Constrained Gaussian Process Regression: Approaches and Implementation Challengescited by 52
  6. 2017Bayesian Probabilistic Numerical Methodscited by 51
  7. 2017Linearly constrained Gaussian processescited by 42
  8. 2022Physics-Informed Gaussian Process Regression Generalizes Linear PDE Solverscited by 41
  9. 2017Probabilistic Numerical Methods for PDE-constrained Bayesian Inverse Problemscited by 20
  10. 2016Gaussian process emulators for computer experiments with inequality constraintscited by 17
  11. 2020Linearly Constrained Gaussian Processes with Boundary Conditionscited by 14
  12. 2017Finite-dimensional Gaussian approximation with linear inequality constraintscited by 12
1 more
  1. 2013Monotone Function Estimation for Computer Experimentscited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.