mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Does Location Matter? A Black-Box Causal Audit Reveals Model-Dependent Audio Grounding in LALM Hallucination

arXiv 2610.13112 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2026cs.AI cs.LG cs.SDcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large audio-language models (LALMs) frequently exhibit object hallucination, affirming absent sounds. The dominant mitigation, Audio-Aware Decoding (AAD), contrasts logits under real audio against an all-zero "blank" waveform, flagged by prior review as out-of-distribution. We introduce a black-box causal test that isolates the claimed evidence itself: localize a claim's evidence region via CLAP similarity, remove it by spectral gating, and compare against a random-window control across a 2x2x2 grid on three LALMs. On Qwen2-Audio-7B, localized ablation's raw AUROC trails blank's (0.613 vs. 0.721); this is a duration confound, not a localization failure, since blank removes the entire clip versus the grid's 2-4 s. Holding duration fixed, localization beats random removal at every cell on both models. Raw detection value remains model-dependent, especially on Audio Flamingo 3. The same evidence corrects decoding: contrastive decoding combining blank and language-prior contrasts, gated and ensembled, raises Qwen2-Audio accuracy from 57.1% to 71.9%, beating AAD alone. A unified causal-grounding profile does not transfer between models, indicating different grounding regimes. The source code and a detailed report of our findings, including identified limitations, are available at https://github.com/khalooei/causa.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2026.

Builds on

20 of 24 references.

References · 20

  1. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
  2. 2022Large-scale Contrastive Language-Audio Pretraining with Feature Fusion and Keyword-to-Caption Augmentationcited by 719
  3. 2023Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive Decodingcited by 688
  4. 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 609
  5. 2024Qwen2-Audio Technical Reportcited by 560
  6. 2019Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth Maskscited by 259
  7. 2025Audio Flamingo 3: Advancing Audio Intelligence with Fully Open Large Audio Language Modelscited by 219
  8. 2024Multi-Modal Hallucination Control by Visual Information Groundingcited by 208
  9. 2024Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models with Instruction Contrastive Decodingcited by 203
  10. 2013Probabilities of Causation: Bounds and Identificationcited by 90
  11. 2024Can Large Audio-Language Models Truly Hear? Tackling Hallucinations with Multi-Task Assessment and Stepwise Audio Reasoningcited by 31
  12. 2025Reducing Object Hallucination in Large Audio-Language Models via Audio-Aware Decodingcited by 24
8 more
  1. 2025FLAM: Frame-Wise Language-Audio Modelingcited by 18
  2. 2026HalluAudio: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Hallucination Detection in Large Audio-Language Modelscited by 8
  3. 2026Causal Tracing of Audio-Text Fusion in Large Audio Language Modelscited by 5
  4. 2026Temporal Contrastive Decoding: A Training-Free Method for Large Audio-Language Modelscited by 3
  5. 2025COPO: Causal-Oriented Policy Optimization for Hallucinations of MLLMscited by 2
  6. 2026Encode Once, Decode Never: Reusing Audio LM Internals for Efficient Temporal Localizationcited by 2
  7. 2026Tracing Audio Grounding and Answer Selection in Audio LLMscited by 1
  8. 2026TAD: Token-Adaptive Contrastive Decoding with Confidence-Guided Gating for Hallucination Mitigation in Large Audio-Language Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.