mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning Features, Not Layouts: Feature-Axis Attention as a Transfer Prior for Medical Imaging

arXiv 2610.13012 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Natural-image-pretrained foundation models are increasingly adapted to medical imaging, yet transfer remains unreliable under domain shift, modality heterogeneity, and label scarcity. We trace part of this fragility to an overlooked design choice. Standard vision transformers place all global modeling on self-attention over spatial tokens, an object-layout prior well suited to natural scenes but not to medical images, where the discriminative signal lies in feature correlations and texture that recur across scanners while layout does not. We ask whether the axis of global attention, spatial versus feature, is itself a lever for transferable medical representations. Existing channel-aware hybrids confound this question, adding channel attention to a spatially-mixed backbone and leaving the axes coupled and the feature axis unmeasurable in isolation. We design FAD-ViT, a backbone that strictly decouples the two axes, making feature-axis attention the primary global operator and the attention axis a controlled variable. Evaluating comprehensively across 23 classification, segmentation, and low-data tasks under matched tokenization, capacity, and protocol, we find that shifting global attention from the spatial to the feature axis leaves from-scratch performance essentially unchanged, yet markedly strengthens transfer. Identical ImageNet pretraining yields up to roughly three times the transfer gain, with consistent improvements on every held-out segmentation task at up to a quarter the parameter count and far lower compute than standard and channel-attention baselines. The advantage is largest where texture rather than geometry is discriminative, tracking greater reuse of pretrained features. The axis of global attention is thus a design lever for medical transfer, and making it channel-primary is a simple, cheap, and principled choice.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2026.

Builds on

17 of 31 references.

References · 17

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  3. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  4. 2021Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutionscited by 1,962
  5. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  6. 2021CvT: Introducing Convolutions to Vision Transformerscited by 947
  7. 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 690
  8. 2021The Medical Segmentation Decathloncited by 628
  9. 2021XCiT: Cross-Covariance Image Transformerscited by 338
  10. 2022DaViT: Dual Attention Vision Transformerscited by 175
  11. 2024SHViT: Single-Head Vision Transformer with Memory Efficient Macro Designcited by 56
  12. 2023A Recent Survey of Vision Transformers for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 23
5 more
  1. 2024LoG-VMamba: Local-Global Vision Mamba for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 9
  2. 2025Adapting Vision-Language Foundation Model for Next Generation Medical Ultrasound Image Analysiscited by 6
  3. 2025FEAT: Full-Dimensional Efficient Attention Transformer for Medical Video Generationcited by 4
  4. 2025Benchmarking Foundation Models and Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Prognosis Prediction in Medical Imagingcited by 4
  5. 2023SCHEME: Scalable Channel Mixer for Vision Transformerscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.