Beyond Second-Order Information: Paid Logistic Regression with Noisy Features
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider online binary prediction with paid stochastic features, where the learner can spend resources to obtain better observations of the underlying features. This setting is motivated by applications such as medical testing, where additional cost can provide more precise measurements of patient's features for predicting a binary outcome. At each round, a latent feature is drawn i.i.d., the response is generated through a logistic model, and the learner chooses how much to pay before observing a noisy version of the feature. The goal of learner is to jointly control prediction loss and acquisition cost. In contrast to the former result on the online linear regression with paid features, covariance information alone is no longer sufficient: two noise distributions with the same covariance may induce different optimal logistic losses, and lower variance can even lead to higher loss. Under a structural ordering in which larger payments yield better observations by removing independent noise, we obtain widetilde O(√T) regret when the noise structure is known and widetilde O(T2/3) regret when it is unknown, with matching lower bounds up to logarithmic factors.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2026.
Builds on
20 of 54 references.
References · 20
- 2020Improved Optimistic Algorithms for Logistic Banditscited by 118
- 2013Relative Loss Bounds for On-line Density Estimation with the Exponential Family of Distributionscited by 60
- 2020Instance-Wise Minimax-Optimal Algorithms for Logistic Banditscited by 57
- 2020Locally Differentially Private (Contextual) Bandits Learningcited by 53
- 2018Logistic Regression: The Importance of Being Impropercited by 41
- 2014Differential Privacy: An Economic Method for Choosing Epsiloncited by 35
- 2017Classification with Costly Features using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 34
- 2014Logistic Regression: Tight Bounds for Stochastic and Online Optimizationcited by 31
- 2019On Robustness of Principal Component Regressioncited by 28
- 2022Optimal and Differentially Private Data Acquisition: Central and Local Mechanismscited by 24
- 2020Logistic Regression Regret: What's the Catch?cited by 10
- 2014Redrawing the Boundaries on Purchasing Data from Privacy-Sensitive Individualscited by 9
8 more
- 2017Contextual Linear Bandits under Noisy Features: Towards Bayesian Oraclescited by 9
- 2017Polynomial Time and Sample Complexity for Non-Gaussian Component Analysis: Spectral Methodscited by 9
- 2023Adaptive Principal Component Regression with Applications to Panel Datacited by 5
- 2024High-dimensional logistic regression with missing data: Imputation, regularization, and universalitycited by 5
- 2014Covariate Selection in High-Dimensional Generalized Linear Models With Measurement Errorcited by 3
- 2016The Value of Privacy: Strategic Data Subjects, Incentive Mechanisms and Fundamental Limitscited by 3
- 2023Trading-Off Payments and Accuracy in Online Classification with Paid Stochastic Expertscited by 3
- 2025Online Linear Regression with Paid Stochastic Featurescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.