REDaCT: Collapse-Free Unlearning in Large Reasoning Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Unlearning in large reasoning models (LRMs) requires removing forget-set information from both the reasoning trace and the final answer. Existing approaches achieve this objective at the cost of reasoning collapse, where the model fails to produce a coherent chain-of-thought (CoT) and does not properly terminate its reasoning process. To address this challenge, we propose REDaCT (REgenerate via Detection and Corrective Tuning), an inference-time unlearning framework for LRMs. REDaCT consists of two key components: (1) a binary leak detector that identifies sentences in the reasoning trace that leak forget-set information, and (2) an embedding optimization module that learns a corrective embedding offline, such that when injected at the first detected leak during inference, it guides subsequent reasoning towards sentences that do not leak forget-set information. Experimental results show that REDaCT completely avoids reasoning collapse, substantially improving reasoning preservation compared to state-of-the-art unlearning methods while maintaining perfect answer forgetting and near-perfect CoT forgetting. Our code is available at: https://github.com/jmaccoby/redact.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 20 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.
Builds on
20 of 41 references.
References · 20
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,061
- 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 1,001
- 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMscited by 533
- 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 509
- 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearningcited by 504
- 2022Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Modelscited by 437
- 2023In-Context Unlearning: Language Models as Few Shot Unlearnerscited by 224
- 2024Simplicity Prevails: Rethinking Negative Preference Optimization for LLM Unlearningcited by 172
- 2018Generating Informative and Diverse Conversational Responses via Adversarial Information Maximizationcited by 116
8 more
- 2024Large Language Model Unlearning via Embedding-Corrupted Promptscited by 116
- 2024Guardrail Baselines for Unlearning in LLMscited by 96
- 2025STAR-1: Safer Alignment of Reasoning LLMs with 1K Datacited by 68
- 2024Soft Prompting for Unlearning in Large Language Modelscited by 46
- 2024On Effects of Steering Latent Representation for Large Language Model Unlearningcited by 32
- 2024Learning to Refuse: Towards Mitigating Privacy Risks in LLMscited by 23
- 2025Reasoning Model Unlearning: Forgetting Traces, Not Just Answers, While Preserving Reasoning Skillscited by 14
- 2025R-TOFU: Unlearning in Large Reasoning Modelscited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026GUARD: Natural Forgetting in Large Reasoning Models via Guided Answer-Reasoning Distillation
- 2026Selective Forgetting for Large Reasoning Models
- 2025Towards Reasoning-Preserving Unlearning in Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2026Making LLMs Truly Forget: Deep Unlearning by Searching, Selecting, and Severing Knowledge Paths
- 2025ThinkLess: A Training-Free Inference-Efficient Method for Reducing Reasoning Redundancy
- 2026Leak-Resistant Unlearning: A New Benchmark for Evaluating Multi-Hop Reasoning Consistency and Recovery Robustness
- 2025Efficient Inference for Large Reasoning Models: A Survey
- 2026DoubtLess: Training-Free Contrastive Decoding for Efficient Reasoning