mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Faithful and Complete LLM-Assisted Automated Construction of Hierarchical Hardware Knowledge Graphs

arXiv 2610.12762 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Hardware datasheets contain engineering specifications essential for component selection, system integration, and hardware compatibility verification. However, manual inspection is tedious and error-prone because datasheets are lengthy and heterogeneous, with dense information fragmented across tables, figures, and text. Although large language models (LLMs) can automate this process, na"ive one-shot processing omits relevant specifications even when the document fits within the model's context window. We present an automated LLM-driven pipeline that transforms hardware datasheets into general-purpose hierarchical hardware knowledge graphs through chunk-based property extraction, hierarchical routing, and iterative refinement. The framework uses LLMs for information extraction and semantic reasoning while preserving source provenance and applying graph updates through validated instructions and deterministic local execution. This staged design reduces per-query context and maintains traceable intermediate representations. The resulting knowledge graphs provide semantically organized, source-grounded hardware properties for downstream retrieval and reasoning. We evaluate the framework on 20 hardware datasheets spanning diverse component types and document lengths. We assess property faithfulness and introduce inter-graph completeness to measure relative semantic coverage without exhaustive ground truth. Our framework achieves 98.8% property faithfulness compared with 76.1% for the one-shot baseline, while fully covering 83.6% of faithful baseline properties; in the reverse direction, the baseline fully covers only 10.5% of ours. These improvements provide more reliable and comprehensive engineering information for downstream hardware design and verification, reducing the risk of overlooked constraints and incorrect decisions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.

Builds on

12 of 18 references.

References · 12

  1. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
  2. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  3. 2023LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understandingcited by 1,417
  4. 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,282
  5. 2024MinerU: An Open-Source Solution for Precise Document Content Extractioncited by 267
  6. 2025Context Length Alone Hurts LLM Performance Despite Perfect Retrievalcited by 127
  7. 2024Multi-Task Inference: Can Large Language Models Follow Multiple Instructions at Once?cited by 30
  8. 2023Evaluating Factual Consistency of Summaries with Large Language Modelscited by 10
  9. 2025ChipMind: Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning for Long-Context Circuit Design Specificationscited by 4
  10. 2026When Gradients Collide: Failure Modes of Multi-Objective Prompt Optimization for LLM Judgescited by 3
  11. 2026DRCY: Agentic Hardware Design Reviewscited by 2
  12. 2026LLM-Driven, Datasheet-Aware Automated Hardware Compatibility Verification for Early-Stage, Pre-Schematic Embedded System Designcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.