mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

GlucoPRISM: Protocol-Supervised Pretraining for Cross-Cohort Glucose Transfer

arXiv 2610.12528 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) foundation models encode each day as one vector that mixes who the person is, what happened that day and how the sensor measured it, so measurement differences travel with the representation into new cohorts. We ask whether pretraining can place the measurement component that harms transfer in known coordinates, so that deployment drops them with a fixed projection and no target data. GlucoPRISM supervises a GlucoFM backbone with response contracts, rules for how each part of the representation should change when only the day or only the sensor changes: a 64-dimensional Trait band should change with neither, a 48-dimensional State band only across days, and a 16-dimensional Sensor band should track the device. Synthetic sensor views calibrated on paired Dexcom and Libre recordings, different-day pairs and glucose-summary targets supply this supervision without clinical labels. Across twelve cross-cohort directions, dropping the Sensor band from the same frozen encoder raises mean transfer AUROC from 68.75 to 73.57, against 69.3 for GlucoFM. The gain has two parts. Into CGMacros, the one target cohort recorded with two sensor types, filtering adds 11 to 19 points, and this holds when the generator is recalibrated on half of the participants and scored on the other half. On the other eight directions filtering is neutral and the encoder itself exceeds GlucoFM by 3.5 points. The device remains linearly decodable after filtering, so the filter removes a device-related component that harms transfer rather than all measurement information. The retained bands improve window AUROC on thirteen of fourteen public task--cohort cells (Holm-adjusted p=0.031) and correlation on fourteen of fifteen clinical endpoints in an external cohort of 9,303 participants.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.

Builds on

21 of 35 references.

References · 21

  1. 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,917
  2. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
  3. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
  4. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
  5. 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
  6. 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 941
  7. 2016Deep Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 930
  8. 2017GradNorm: Gradient Normalization for Adaptive Loss Balancing in Deep Multitask Networkscited by 834
  9. 2020Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)cited by 742
  10. 2020Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projectioncited by 455
  11. 2018Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning modelscited by 379
  12. 2016Domain Separation Networkscited by 320
9 more
  1. 2021Self-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentations Provably Isolates Content from Stylecited by 312
  2. 2023LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed formcited by 267
  3. 2020Weakly-Supervised Disentanglement Without Compromisescited by 239
  4. 2020Representation Learning via Invariant Causal Mechanismscited by 199
  5. 2018Adversarial Removal of Demographic Attributes from Text Datacited by 170
  6. 2019DIVA: Domain Invariant Variational Autoencoderscited by 115
  7. 2026OSF: On Pre-training and Scaling of Sleep Foundation Modelscited by 12
  8. 2026GlucoFM: A Dual-Stream Foundation Model for Continuous Glucose Monitoringcited by 7
  9. 2026CGM-JEPA: Learning Consistent Continuous Glucose Monitor Representations via Predictive Self-Supervised Pretrainingcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.