mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Rounding in Preconditioner Space: Redesigning 4-bit AdamW Optimizer-State Quantization

arXiv 2610.12444 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Quantizing AdamW's optimizer states reduces persistent storage, but quantization errors propagate through the moment recurrences and perturb subsequent adaptive updates. We redesign 4-bit optimizer-state quantization for AdamW from the perspective of rounding space: the coordinate in which a quantizer chooses between adjacent reconstruction levels. For the second moment, a local analysis of the quantization cell adjacent to zero shows that small mean state error need not imply small mean preconditioner error at the next step. A one-dimensional quadratic construction further shows qualitatively different optimization dynamics under state-space and preconditioner-space rounding. These results motivate Zero-Inclusive Preconditioner-space Stochastic Rounding (ZIP-SR), which retains zero in the second-moment codebook and computes stochastic-rounding probabilities in preconditioner space. As a complementary route, Zero-Excluding EDEN calibration (ZE-EDEN) uses a zero-excluding second-moment codebook and rescales the quantized second-moment block to mitigate the preconditioner distortion caused by the positive quantization floor. Both configurations use 4-bit NormalFloat (NF4) for the first moment, with targeted stochastic rounding of the LM-head first moment during the final 10% of training. Across GPT- and Llama-style pretraining experiments ranging from 130M to 2.7B parameters, both methods reduce TorchAO 4-bit AdamW's mean validation-loss gap to 32-bit AdamW at every evaluated model size, with the largest reported gap reduction reaching 70%. In full-parameter supervised fine-tuning, both recipes achieve lower validation loss than TorchAO while remaining close to 32-bit AdamW on downstream tasks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.

Builds on

13 of 41 references.

References · 13

  1. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  4. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  5. 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,228
  6. 2025TorchAO: PyTorch-Native Training-to-Serving Model Optimizationcited by 26
  7. 2025Effective Quantization of Muon Optimizer Statescited by 11
  8. 2026Full-Stack FP4: Stable LLM Pretraining with Quantized Projections, Optimizers, and Attentioncited by 8
  9. 2026Understanding Quantization of Optimizer States in LLM Pre-training: Dynamics of State Staleness and Effectiveness of State Resetscited by 6
  10. 2025Pushing the Limits of Low-Bit Optimizers: A Focus on EMA Dynamicscited by 5
  11. 2026FlashOptim: Optimizers for Memory-Efficient Trainingcited by 5
  12. 2026STQuant: Spatio-Temporal Adaptive Framework for Optimizer Quantization in Large Multimodal Model Trainingcited by 4
1 more
  1. 2026Gefen: Optimized Stochastic Optimizercited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Beyond Dense Adam States: Adaptive Log-Space Quantization for Memory-Efficient Optimizers
  2. 2026Contraction-Gauge Preconditioning for Quantized Matrix Multiplication
  3. 20218-bit Optimizers via Block-wise Quantization
  4. 2024Memory-Efficient 4-bit Preconditioned Stochastic Optimization
  5. 2026StableQAT: Stable Quantization-Aware Training at Ultra-Low Bitwidths
  6. 2022On One-Bit Quantization
  7. 2023Memory Efficient Optimizers with 4-bit States
  8. 2026Compander-Aligned Query Geometry for Quantized Zeroth-Order Optimization