mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Latent Core Tokenizer: Compress, but Meaningfully

arXiv 2610.12376 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Tokenizers are commonly optimized for compression, but a compact vocabulary does not necessarily distribute its capacity evenly across languages. We introduce the Latent Core Tokenizer (LCT), a language-agnostic approach that separates structural discovery from vocabulary construction. LCT uses Minimum Description Length, entropy-based boundary signals, and morphotactic constraints to identify reusable linguistic units before constructing a shared vocabulary. Across 104 languages with a 200K-token vocabulary, LCT achieves lower fertility and higher MorphScore than BPE, Unigram, and parity-aware BPE, while maintaining comparable cross-lingual disparity in tokenization cost. Across four multilingual downstream benchmarks, LCT improves aggregate score by 1.48, 1.83, and 2.00 points over BPE, Unigram, and parity-aware BPE, respectively. Our findings show that compression alone does not predict representation quality and highlight the importance of morphology-driven structural discovery and how frequency is used to allocate the final vocabulary across languages.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.

Builds on

1 of 17 references.

References · 1

  1. 2025Evaluating Morphological Alignment of Tokenizers in 70 Languagescited by 22

Built on by

Not cited yet.