mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SparseDecoding: Decoding-Aware Pruning for Accurate and Efficient LLM Inference

arXiv 2610.12327 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2026cs.LG cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: Efficient LLM inference and serving → Early exit and edge inference also fits: Diffusion LLM and MoE inference

Abstract (arXiv)

The memory-bound nature of the decoding stage of large language model (LLM) inference incurs significant latency. Layer-wise training-free network pruning approaches guided by the Hessian have been a prominent solution to this problem, as pruning reduces the number of nonzero parameters read from memory during decoding. Nevertheless, typical methods in this line compute the Hessian using pre-collected natural sequences, whereas the model is fed self-generated tokens during decoding, creating a distribution shift between the two sequences. The Hessian calculated on the natural sequence is different from that calculated on the generated sequence. We observe that this discrepancy causes the activation distribution during generation to deviate from that used for pruning, further hurting the pruned model performance. Moreover, most existing LLM pruning methods that bring actual speedup primarily target the sparse matrix-matrix (SpMM) multiplication, providing limited support for the sparse matrix-vector (SpMV) operations, which dominate decoding. To solve these problems, we introduce SparseDecoding, a principled decoding-aware pruning framework tailored for accurate and efficient LLM decoding. Specifically, at the algorithmic axis, SparseDecoding constructs calibration matrices from layer-wise activations collected during the dense-model autoregressive generation, excluding prefill, thereby aligning the pruning objective with the decoding activations. At the system axis, we develop an optimized N:M sparse matrix-vector kernel with bitmask indexing and fixed-step traversal. Substantial empirical results on representative LLMs (Llama-3.1-8B, Llama-3.3-70B, Qwen3-14B / 32B) demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms standard fixed-text calibration on the long-form generation benchmarks while achieving up to 1.48x end-to-end wall-clock decoding speedup on A100 GPUs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Early exit and edge inference, one of 12 directions in Efficient LLM inference and serving. Builds on 7 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.

Builds on

7 of 43 references.

References · 7

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  3. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  4. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  5. 2021Accelerating Sparse Deep Neural Networkscited by 223
  6. 2023ClassEval: A Manually-Crafted Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Class-level Code Generationcited by 168
  7. 2025Think Before You Prune: Self-Reflective Structured Pruning for Reasoning Language Modelscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Accelerating LLM Inference with Flexible N:M Sparsity via A Fully Digital Compute-in-Memory Accelerator
  2. 2026Beyond FLOPs: Benchmarking Real Inference Acceleration of LLM Pruning under a GEMM-Centric Taxonomy
  3. 2026Unified Static-Dynamic Pruning for Efficient LLM Inference
  4. 2025R-Sparse: Rank-Aware Activation Sparsity for Efficient LLM Inference
  5. 2025MaskPrune: Mask-based LLM Pruning for Layer-wise Uniform Structures
  6. 2023One-Shot Sensitivity-Aware Mixed Sparsity Pruning for Large Language Models
  7. 2026SVD Contextual Sparsity Predictors for Fast LLM Inference
  8. 2026When Pruning Meets Interpretability: Preserving Sparse Autoencoder Robustness in LLMs