Looking Inside LLMs: Small-World Connectivity as a Signature of Reasoning Performance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding large language model (LLM) reasoning requires looking beyond behavioral performance to examine how reasoning ability is reflected in internal organization. Inspired by neuroscience findings linking higher intelligence to stronger small-world organization in functional brain networks, we investigate small-world connectivity as a structural signature of LLM reasoning. We construct functional graphs from attention-head activation similarities and find that a higher small-world index (SWI), capturing local clustering and short global paths, consistently correlates with better fluid reasoning performance across models and training checkpoints. Since local clustering is central to small-world organization, we further examine how heads important for model performance connect within and across communities. We find that these heads tend to have a larger share of connection weight within their own communities (high core scores) and a more concentrated weight distribution across communities (low bridge scores). These observations motivate the hypothesis that high core and low bridge scores serve as structural indicators of head importance for reasoning capability. We validate this hypothesis through pruning, introducing Small-World Allocation (SWA), a hierarchical sparsity allocation method guided by these scores. Across six LLMs, SWA better preserves small-world organization and model performance than competing allocation strategies, reducing WikiText perplexity by up to 20%. Together, these findings identify small-world functional connectivity as a measurable signature of LLM reasoning performance, offering a structural perspective that complements behavioral evaluation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.
Builds on
12 of 55 references.
References · 12
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
- 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 776
- 2025DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Modelscited by 755
- 2025Determining Layer-wise Sparsity for Large Language Models Through a Theoretical Perspectivecited by 13
- 2023Topological Data Analysis for Neural Network Analysis: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 9
- 2025Eigenspectrum Analysis of Neural Networks without Aspect Ratio Biascited by 9
- 2025Truly Assessing Fluid Intelligence of Large Language Models through Dynamic Reasoning Evaluationcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.