mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Unlocking the Regulatory Genome by ARGUS: An Evidence-Constrained Agentic Framework for Interpreting Single Nucleotide Variants

arXiv 2610.12281 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2026q-bio.GN cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Medical and scientific domain agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Over 90% of disease-associated variants from genome-wide association studies fall in noncoding regulatory regions, yet their functional interpretation remains a central open problem in genomic medicine. Large language models prompted to interpret such variants routinely hallucinate transcription factor (TF) binding changes, fabricate experimental support, and assign biological significance to statistically negligible signals. We present ARGUS (Agentic Regulatory Genomics for an Uncertainty-aware Scientist), which strictly separates deterministic biological computation from LLM-mediated reasoning. ARGUS wraps 458 DNABERT-based TF binding models in a hypothesis-directed investigation loop where a planner selects evidence sources based on current uncertainty, a verifier deterministically interprets each observation, and intermediate results change the investigation path. On variant rs6983267 at the 8q24 cancer risk locus, the same planner produces four divergent trajectories for four TFs. FOXA1 is rescued in 3 steps when real ADASTRA allele-specific binding data (15 experiments, FDR = 0.030) reveals a model false negative masked by saturation. KLF6 traverses 8 steps across ADASTRA, JASPAR motif analysis, and ENCODE cCRE regulatory annotation before abstaining due to mixed indirect evidence. RAD21 abstains in 8 steps after ADASTRA returns a coverage-qualified but nonsignificant allelic test (5 experiments, FDR = 0.65), and SP1, which shares FOXA1's saturated retained prediction, abstains because no direct experimental evidence exists at this locus. All observations come from real ADASTRA, JASPAR, and ENCODE cCRE queries; none are simulated. A comparison of fixed-priority and LLM-mediated planning shows that the LLM planner reaches identical verdicts with fewer tool calls by declining evidence that cannot resolve the claim under test.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 1 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.

Builds on

1 of 12 references.

References · 1

  1. 2025DeepVRegulome: DNABERT-based deep-learning framework for predicting the functional impact of short genomic variants on the human regulomecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Progressive Multi-Agent Reasoning for Biological Perturbation Prediction
  2. 2026SciHorizon-GENE: Benchmarking LLM for Life Sciences Inference from Gene Knowledge to Functional Understanding
  3. 2026SCTA: An Agentic Framework for Stable and Interpretable Target Gene Discovery from Single-Cell RNA Sequencing
  4. 2025GenoMAS: A Multi-Agent Framework for Scientific Discovery via Code-Driven Gene Expression Analysis
  5. 2026GenoMorph: Pathway-Grounded Genomic Disease Reasoning via Adaptive Latent Computation
  6. 2026Evaluating Agentic Bioinformatics through Function, Evidence, and Validation
  7. 2024GeneAgent: Self-verification Language Agent for Gene Set Knowledge Discovery using Domain Databases
  8. 2026Biological Reasoning-Informed Regression for Interpretable Regulatory DNA Activity Prediction