mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Early Signatures of Memorization in Diffusion Models via Basin Geometry and Cyclic Denoising

arXiv 2610.11670 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2026cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion foundations and sampling

Abstract (arXiv)

Diffusion models generalize early in training and later reproduce individual training samples. Standard tests detect memorization only once one-shot generation produces near-copies, leaving a released model unaudited until its outputs fail. We show that memorization is encoded in the geometry of the learned energy landscape before it appears in generated samples, a state we call latent memorization. Using score divergence and basin volume, we find that localized basins form around training samples and separate them from held-out samples before the first memorized sample appears, with an onset that follows the same O(n) scaling as the memorization time. We probe these basins with cyclic denoising, which repeatedly applies partial noising and denoising. Under the exact empirical score, we prove that cycling started near an isolated training sample recovers it and returns to it over any finite number of cycles with high probability. In trained models, cycling recovers training images from CelebA and CIFAR-10 checkpoints whose one-shot samples contain no copies, and at a CelebA checkpoint with 0.1% one-shot copies, 500 cycles raise the memorized fraction above 30%. Cycling also reveals degenerate attractors that match no single training image and fade as training proceeds, so residence in a basin does not by itself imply memorization. These findings hold on a Gaussian mixture, CelebA, and CIFAR-10 across optimizers, architectures, noise schedules, and training-set sizes, and extend to off-the-shelf Stable Diffusion v1.4, where the cycled conditional-unconditional divergence gap separates memorized from non-memorized prompts with an AUC of 0.944 and a TPR of 0.866 at 1% FPR. More broadly, what a diffusion model has memorized is a property of the geometry and stability of its learned distribution, and assessing it requires examining this structure rather than generated outputs alone.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion foundations and sampling, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 2 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.

Builds on

2 of 34 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Why Diffusion Models Don't Memorize: The Role of Implicit Dynamical Regularization in Training23 May

Other references · 1

  1. 2023A Reproducible Extraction of Training Images from Diffusion Modelscited by 61

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Two Calm Ends and the Wild Middle: A Geometric Picture of Memorization in Diffusion Models
  2. 2025How Diffusion Models Memorize
  3. 2026Loss Curvature as a Sampling-Free Proxy for Memorization in Diffusion Models
  4. 2024Losing dimensions: Geometric memorization in generative diffusion
  5. 2026Memorization Control in Diffusion Models from Denoising-centric Perspective
  6. 2026Localizing Memorized Regions in Diffusion Models via Coordinate-Wise Curvature Differences
  7. 2025Provable Separations between Memorization and Generalization in Diffusion Models
  8. 2024Understanding and Mitigating Memorization in Generative Models via Sharpness of Probability Landscapes