mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Incremental Open-Ended Deep Research with Structured Harness

arXiv 2610.11566 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing Open-Ended Deep Research (OEDR) systems primarily generate reports from scratch, making them inefficient for scenarios where research reports need to be continuously maintained as new information emerges. We introduce Incremental Open-Ended Deep Research (Incremental-OEDR), a research setting that treats a report as an evolving research state and incrementally updates it by preserving valid knowledge, revising outdated or incomplete content, and incorporating newly available information. To support this setting, we propose Structured Harness, which represents reports as structured collections of outlines, sections, and supporting evidence, and provides structured retrieval, a persistent structured evidence pool, and structured generation for selective report updating and evidence reuse. We further establish a temporal evaluation framework spanning ten years, with Single-Step Task and Long-Chain Task to evaluate incremental updates over both individual transitions and long-term update chains. Extensive Experiments on DeepResearch Bench and DeepConsult under both the Open-source Configuration (OC) and Proprietary Configuration (PC) show that Incremental-OEDR maintains competitive report quality while substantially improving report continuity and reducing research costs. As shown in Figure~reffig:profile, it achieves up to 0.51 higher content-level ROUGE-L F1, 0.63 higher outline-level EM F1, 33% lower token consumption, and 61% fewer search calls than OEDR on DeepResearch Bench. For more details, please refer to our project page: https://ioedr-project.github.io/.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.

Builds on

19 of 33 references.

References · 19

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  2. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
  3. 2025BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agentscited by 616
  4. 2025WebThinker: Empowering Large Reasoning Models with Deep Research Capabilitycited by 320
  5. 2025DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research Agentscited by 236
  6. 2025WebSailor: Navigating Super-human Reasoning for Web Agentcited by 218
  7. 2025WebDancer: Towards Autonomous Information Seeking Agencycited by 180
  8. 2025Deep Research Agents: A Systematic Examination And Roadmapcited by 122
  9. 2024The Prompt Report: A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering Techniquescited by 115
  10. 2025WebResearcher: Unleashing unbounded reasoning capability in Long-Horizon Agentscited by 66
  11. 2025Deep Research: A Survey of Autonomous Research Agentscited by 63
  12. 2025Tongyi DeepResearch Technical Reportcited by 53
7 more
  1. 2025DeepResearchGym: A Free, Transparent, and Reproducible Evaluation Sandbox for Deep Researchcited by 51
  2. 2025AgentOrchestra: Orchestrating Multi-Agent Intelligence with the Tool-Environment-Agent(TEA) Protocolcited by 36
  3. 2026Dive into Claude Code: The Design Space of Today's and Future AI Agent Systemscited by 33
  4. 2025DeepScholar-Bench: A Live Benchmark and Automated Evaluation for Generative Research Synthesiscited by 31
  5. 2025Beyond Outlining: Heterogeneous Recursive Planning for Adaptive Long-form Writing with Language Modelscited by 15
  6. 2025Deep Researcher with Test-Time Diffusioncited by 3
  7. 2026A Tale of Two Graphs: Separating Knowledge Exploration from Outline Structure for Open-Ended Deep Researchcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.