RISR: Residual-Informed Scientific Equation Discovery with Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Symbolic regression combines structural search with numerical fitting, but aggregate fit scores do not describe how the remaining error varies across inputs. We introduce RISR, a residual-informed method that uses these error patterns to guide formula discovery and learn which corrections are worth fitting. A residual encoder compresses aligned inputs, targets, current predictions, and residuals into continuous tokens that condition a language model to propose formulas. For subsequent refinement, a dual-view relational encoder uses additive and regularized multiplicative residuals to predict the post-fit utility of candidate corrections. We evaluate RISR on scientific tasks from the LLM-SRBench. RISR achieves 63.57% and 38.50% ID accuracy at the 1% and 0.1% pointwise relative-error tolerances, respectively. The corresponding OOD accuracies are 56.07% and 38.24%. RISR outperforms the reported baselines using the same backbone. The results show that our residual-informed approach can improve numerical equation recovery.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.
Builds on
4 of 24 references.
References · 4
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,386
- 2025GLM-4.5: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding (ARC) Foundation Modelscited by 467
- 2023Interpretable Machine Learning for Science with PySR and SymbolicRegression.jlcited by 54
Built on by
Not cited yet.