mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

When Scene Text Hijacks the Scene: Uncovering, Exploiting, and Mitigating Rendered-Text Semantic Leakage in Image Generation Models

arXiv 2610.11286 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The reliability and accountability of image generative models (IGMs) are essential for building responsible and trustworthy AI systems. Recent IGMs, such as Nano Banana and GPT-Image, now support complex instruction following, realistic image synthesis, and controllable scene-text rendering. As these capabilities expand, safety analysis must also account for new control channels introduced by complex prompts. In this work, we study rendered-text semantic leakage, a largely overlooked phenomenon in open-domain text rendering. Although rendered text is intended to serve as a local visual constraint that should be reproduced verbatim in the generated image, it also carries linguistic semantics that may be interpreted by the model as part of the input instruction. This makes rendered text a potential semantic control channel whose safety implications remain insufficiently understood. We systematically characterize this phenomenon by decoupling the main visual prompt from the rendered text and measuring their individual and compositional effects on generated images. We quantify semantic leakage and rendering fidelity, and further analyze how leakage emerges from intermediate model evidence. We then show that harmful semantics embedded in scene text can persist through LLM-based prompt enhancement pipelines and steer non-text image regions, even when the main visual prompt remains benign. Finally, we propose a preliminary mitigation approach that reduces unsafe semantic transfer from rendered text to non-text regions while preserving the intended text-rendering behavior on FLUX-2-dev. Our findings reveal rendered text as a dual-use carrier of visible data and latent semantics, exposing a text-centric cross-modal attack surface in modern IGMs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.

Builds on

17 of 66 references.

References · 17

  1. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
  2. 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,290
  3. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
  4. 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
  5. 2025Qwen-Image Technical Reportcited by 973
  6. 2025Emerging Properties in Unified Multimodal Pretrainingcited by 855
  7. 2025Janus-Pro: Unified Multimodal Understanding and Generation with Data and Model Scalingcited by 787
  8. 2025Z-Image: An Efficient Image Generation Foundation Model with Single-Stream Diffusion Transformercited by 247
  9. 2020PP-OCR: A Practical Ultra Lightweight OCR Systemcited by 147
  10. 2025LongCat-Image Technical Reportcited by 92
  11. 2024UnsafeBench: Benchmarking Image Safety Classifiers on Real-World and AI-Generated Imagescited by 52
  12. 2024LlavaGuard: An Open VLM-based Framework for Safeguarding Vision Datasets and Modelscited by 49
5 more
  1. 2025ConceptAttention: Diffusion Transformers Learn Highly Interpretable Featurescited by 48
  2. 2025Image Can Bring Your Memory Back: A Novel Multi-Modal Guided Attack against Image Generation Model Unlearningcited by 9
  3. 2025OCRGenBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating OCR Generative Capabilitiescited by 8
  4. 2025When Memory Becomes a Vulnerability: Towards Multi-turn Jailbreak Attacks against Text-to-Image Generation Systemscited by 4
  5. 2026Seeing Is No Longer Believing: Frontier Image Generation Models, Synthetic Visual Evidence, and Real-World Riskcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.