OpenProblemBench: Benchmarking AI on Open Problems in the Foundational Theoretical Sciences
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The next frontier for artificial general intelligence is tackling unresolved scientific problems, calling for benchmarks that assess progress beyond established knowledge. We introduce OpenProblemBench, a benchmark of 82 unresolved problems drawn from the mathematics and theoretical physics literature. Each problem supplies the research context, assumptions, and prior progress needed to investigate the question. We select problems whose proposed solutions admit comparatively clear checks of their decisive mathematical or computational claims. Four evaluator models independently assess the correctness, completeness, and degree of progress of each submission without reference solutions. Across seven evaluated configurations, GPT-6-Astra achieves the highest mean judged solve rate of 14.0%, compared with 5.5-6.7% for the evaluated full-size open models and 2.4-3.7% for Flash models. Case comparisons connect stronger outcomes to changes in problem representation, general arguments that extend beyond finite evidence, and proofs of the steps needed to complete a solution. By grounding evaluation in questions arising from the research literature, OpenProblemBench provides a setting for investigating the capabilities and limitations of AI as a contributor to foundational theoretical science.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.
Builds on
16 of 26 references.
References · 16
- 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,071
- 2025PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Researchcited by 321
- 2024FrontierMath: A Benchmark for Evaluating Advanced Mathematical Reasoning in AIcited by 243
- 2024ScienceAgentBench: Toward Rigorous Assessment of Language Agents for Data-Driven Scientific Discoverycited by 235
- 2024SciCode: A Research Coding Benchmark Curated by Scientistscited by 178
- 2025AstaBench: Rigorous Benchmarking of AI Agents with a Scientific Research Suitecited by 53
- 2026FrontierScience: Evaluating AI's Ability to Perform Expert-Level Scientific Taskscited by 47
- 2025MLRC-Bench: Can Language Agents Solve Machine Learning Research Challenges?cited by 28
- 2026FIRE-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents on the Rediscovery of Scientific Insightscited by 16
- 2026Benchmarking AI Agents for Addressing Scientific Challenges Across Scalescited by 12
- 2025UQ: Assessing Language Models on Unsolved Questionscited by 9
- 2026Measuring Progress in Reasoning Toward Mathematical Discovery with Automatic Verificationcited by 9
4 more
- 2026How Do Agents Fail on AutoResearch: End-to-End Diagnostic Evaluation on 100 Real-World Frontier Research Taskscited by 8
- 2026PRL-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark Evaluating LLMs' Capabilities in Frontier Physics Researchcited by 6
- 2026TruthInsightBench: An Evidence-Grounded Benchmark for Automated Evaluation of Open-Ended Scientific Discovery Agentscited by 1
- 2026Large Knowledge Model: From Papers to a Scientific Reasoning Landscapecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.