Amortized Off-Policy Evaluation for LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurate evaluation is central to selecting which LLM to deploy, yet testing a candidate on live traffic exposes real users to an unvetted model. Teams therefore evaluate candidates offline, on data produced by already-deployed models. This is off-policy evaluation (OPE), and it faces two distribution shifts: as a model is updated in post-training, its responses diverge from the logged ones (policy shift), and the reward definition under which it is judged changes with business requirements (reward shift). Classical OPE methods are ill-suited to this continual-deployment setting because they are defined per task and require fitting from scratch on every new logged dataset or reward definition. To address this, we propose PFN-OPE, a prior-data fitted network that amortizes OPE across a distribution of contextual-bandit tasks. We pretrain it once on tasks constructed from a pool of LLM responses scored by several reward functions, in which both shifts occur. At test-time it maps a logged dataset and one sampled target response per prompt to a value estimate in a single forward pass, with no per-task fitting. On HelpSteer2 and UltraFeedback with Qwen, Llama, and Gemma policies, PFN-OPE achieves 2.0 to 9.3 times lower error than the best baselines across all tested configurations in the reward-shifted settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2026.
Builds on
4 of 33 references.
References · 4
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
- 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,175
Built on by
Not cited yet.