mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Phase-HDC: Replacing Optimizer History with Gradient Thresholds in Discrete Phase Learning

arXiv 2610.10630 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training a compact model often needs far more memory than storing it, because the optimizer keeps its own records of past gradients. For a hyperdimensional classifier whose learned parameters are low-bit angles, which we call a phase memory, these records take several times more memory than the model itself. We ask whether such a model can be trained while storing nothing but the model. The proposed method, Phase-HDC, turns each stored angle by at most one step per update, against the sign of its current gradient, and only when that gradient is large enough. We show that this simple rule is the exact solution of a first-order loss model in which every changed parameter pays a fixed cost. When everything except the update rule is held fixed, Phase-HDC matches the accuracy of Adam with 6-bit moments while storing three times less. Across eleven image, tabular, and text datasets, it stores 16--23× less than standard float32 Adam and 4--6× less than 8-bit Adam. The price is an average loss of about five accuracy points against float32 Adam, while Phase-HDC is more accurate than 8-bit Adam on six of the eleven datasets, including byte-level text prediction, where 8-bit Adam collapses. Instrumented training runs explain these outcomes. Once parameters must sit on a discrete grid, Adam's moments mainly decide whether a parameter moves at all, a decision that a threshold on the current gradient can make without memory, and coarse quantization of the moments breaks this decision for inputs that the data rarely contain. The storage savings are logical state rather than measured hardware memory.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2026.

Builds on

12 of 33 references.

References · 12

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  3. 2023TinyStories: How Small Can Language Models Be and Still Speak Coherent English?cited by 425
  4. 2023Symbolic Discovery of Optimization Algorithmscited by 423
  5. 20218-bit Optimizers via Block-wise Quantizationcited by 395
  6. 2018Training and Inference with Integers in Deep Neural Networkscited by 84
  7. 2019Latent Weights Do Not Exist: Rethinking Binarized Neural Network Optimizationcited by 58
  8. 2022LeHDC: Learning-Based Hyperdimensional Computing Classifiercited by 17
  9. 2026Deep Sequence Modeling with Quantum Dynamics: Language as a Wave Functioncited by 2
  10. 2025Unifying Sign and Magnitude for Optimizing Deep Vision Networks via ThermoLioncited by 1
  11. 2026THDC: Training Hyperdimensional Computing Models with Backpropagationcited by 1
  12. 2026The Quantum Shortcut: Complex Phase-State Dynamics Reduce the Optimization Steps of Sequence Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.