mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning joint probabilistic weather forecasts from station observations alone

arXiv 2610.09898 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2026stat.AP cs.LG physics.ao-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Assessing compound weather risks requires forecasts representing dependence between variables. CLARA (Calibrated Advection-Routing Attention) learns joint Gaussian predictive distributions of five surface variables from station observations alone, without numerical weather prediction or reanalysis; the approximately 28,000-parameter model supports CPU training and prediction. Across six multi-year folds on 96 stations, its lead-mean energy score is 4.9% lower than that of a learned comparator with matched temporal inputs (4.7% with a similar parameter count) and 11-65% lower than those of statistical baselines. Holding marginal variances fixed, removing learned correlations worsens joint negative log-likelihood by 1.0-2.8 nats per station. A covariance-scale estimator, proved consistent under stated assumptions, improves short-lead calibration but over-corrects at long leads. Synthetic interventions show an attention-bias coefficient alone does not measure forecast influence. Retrained in ten regions on six continents, CLARA outperforms persistence in all 60 multi-year region-lead comparisons and a similarly sized learned model in 57 of 60.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2026.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.