mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Deafening Silence: Catastrophic Forgetting Lives in the Output Embeddings of Tokens the Data Never Speaks

arXiv 2610.09835 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Continual pre-training and fine-tuning in Large Language Models (LLMs) inevitably induce catastrophic forgetting, typically mitigated by replay using often-inaccessible original data. In this data-free regime, we analyze where forgetting occurs and why. Systematic parameter freezing across five settings up to 1.4B reveals that forgetting concentrates selectively in the output embeddings of tokens rarely seen in the new corpus, whereas the same sqrt(v-hat) band of the body is inert and new learning resides elsewhere. This localization is governed by the vocabulary deficiency of the corpus rather than the training mode, allowing pre-retraining risk ranking from token counts alone within a fixed base model. Mechanistically, absent tokens receive persistent one-sided softmax gradients that Adam's second-moment (sqrt(v-hat)) normalization amplifies into full-sized updates. We therefore propose an intervention: raising Adam's epsilon exclusively for the output projection during training. Across eight settings spanning 160M to 12B parameters and four model families, this removes 39.4% to 67.9% of forgetting across all seven stable configurations without degrading target learning or requiring per-model tuning. The defense combines additively or better with replay (79.8% on Qwen/Korean) and rescues released-head LoRA from a 23-fold forgetting surge. Because post-hoc editing of the drifted rows recovers under 5% of forgetting, the intervention must operate during training. Our findings indicate that a single-line optimizer adjustment may serve as the primary defense against catastrophic forgetting where the corpus starves the vocabulary.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2026.

Builds on

19 of 28 references.

References · 19

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  2. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
  3. 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,076
  4. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 785
  5. 2019Large Scale Incremental Learningcited by 727
  6. 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 658
  7. 2020Class-incremental learning: survey and performance evaluation on image classificationcited by 446
  8. 2021Gradient Projection Memory for Continual Learningcited by 338
  9. 2024LoRA Learns Less and Forgets Lesscited by 313
  10. 2023Orthogonal Subspace Learning for Language Model Continual Learningcited by 296
  11. 2019On Empirical Comparisons of Optimizers for Deep Learningcited by 99
  12. 2025Spurious Forgetting in Continual Learning of Language Modelscited by 47
7 more
  1. 2023Tensor Programs IVb: Adaptive Optimization in the Infinite-Width Limitcited by 35
  2. 2020Investigating Catastrophic Forgetting During Continual Training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 17
  3. 2024MoFO: Momentum-Filtered Optimizer for Mitigating Forgetting in LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 13
  4. 2026Mechanistic Analysis of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 10
  5. 2024Continual Learning Optimizations for Auto-regressive Decoder of Multilingual ASR systemscited by 7
  6. 2025Scalable Strategies for Continual Learning with Replaycited by 3
  7. 2026Catastrophic Forgetting is Low-Rank: A Function-Space Theory for Continual Adaptationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.