mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bridge Routing Heads: Where Multilingual Multi-hop Reasoning Lives in LLMs

arXiv 2610.09733 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2026cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation also fits: Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Multilingual LLMs answer the same multi-hop reasoning question across languages, but we lack a mechanistic account of whether they share an internal circuit. We identify Bridge Routing Heads (BRH) in two large multilingual LLMs through a three-stage pipeline. The resulting language-specific head sets exhibit near-complete mutual exclusivity across the five languages, with a mean Jaccard similarity of only 0.017 for Llama 3.1 70B and 0.057 for Qwen 2.5 72B, revealing language-idiosyncratic circuits. Ablating general BRH increases two-hop Negative Log-Likelihood (NLL) by 39-89x the random-head baseline, providing direct causal evidence of their role. Amplifying these heads in a failing target-language pass rescues up to 51.7% of cross-lingual failures, with no training. The two models share this dual-circuit pattern but allocate heads differently: Llama concentrates chaining in a large general pool, while Qwen leans on larger language-specific pools. Together these results show that activation-level intervention alone can recover correct answers from cross-lingual reasoning failures.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 2 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2026.

Builds on

2 of 24 references.

References · 2

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Opening the Black Box: A Survey on the Mechanisms of Multi-Step Reasoning in Large Language Models
  2. 2026Rethinking the Multilingual Reasoning Gap with Layer Swap
  3. 2025A Comprehensive Evaluation of Multilingual Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: Performance, Consistency, and Faithfulness Across Languages
  4. 2024Seemingly Plausible Distractors in Multi-Hop Reasoning: Are Large Language Models Attentive Readers?
  5. 2025Cross-Lingual Consistency: A Novel Inference Framework for Advancing Reasoning in Large Language Models
  6. 2024Large Language Models Still Face Challenges in Multi-Hop Reasoning with External Knowledge
  7. 2025When Less Language is More: Language-Reasoning Disentanglement Makes LLMs Better Multilingual Reasoners
  8. 2025Multilingual Routing in Mixture-of-Experts