RT-Safe: Benchmarking Agent Safety in Real-Time Embodied Environment
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance also fits: Multimodal and embodied agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Rapid progress in AI agents has brought growing attention to agent safety, with extensive evaluation focused on digital environments. As agents move into the physical world, embodied safety becomes increasingly important: failures can cause human injury and costly hardware damage. Beyond selecting safe actions, embodied agents must also operate under real-time constraints: the physical world does not pause while an agent reasons. As pedestrians move and vehicles approach during inference, an action that appears safe at observation time may become unsafe before execution. Real-time embodied safety therefore depends on both decision quality and decision latency. We introduce RT-SAFE, a simulated urban benchmark for evaluating embodied-agent safety under real-time constraints. RT-SAFE combines navigation tasks with moving actors, environmental hazards, and traffic rules, while allowing the world to evolve throughout inference and action execution. Across eight VLMs, agents achieve high task completion yet almost never complete safely: in the hardest setting, only 0.7% of episodes finish without a safety event. More strikingly, matched static and real-time evaluations yield task completion rates of 91.3% and 94.1%, respectively, while real-time execution increases collisions by 12.3×. These results reveal that standard task success can mask substantial safety failures, and that decision latency itself can become a source of physical risk. Finally, we show that RT-SAFE can support offline RL training and substantially reduce collision rates while achieving strong task completion.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025AGENTSAFE: Benchmarking the Safety of Embodied Agents on Hazardous Instructions
- 2024SafeAgentBench: A Benchmark for Safe Task Planning of Embodied LLM Agents
- 2025IS-Bench: Evaluating Interactive Safety of VLM-Driven Embodied Agents in Daily Household Tasks
- 2025SafeMind: Benchmarking and Mitigating Safety Risks in Embodied LLM Agents
- 2026Safety in Embodied AI: A Survey of Risks, Attacks, and Defenses
- 2026BeSafe-Bench: Unveiling Behavioral Safety Risks of Situated Agents in Functional Environments
- 2025A Framework for Benchmarking and Aligning Task-Planning Safety in LLM-Based Embodied Agents
- 2026SafeBranch: Branch-Pair Safety Alignment for Embodied Agents