mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Neighborhood Smoothing for Calibration

arXiv 2610.09020 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern neural networks are often miscalibrated, with a tendency to overconfidence. Existing train-time calibration methods largely modify task losses or calibration penalties, leaving neighborhood structure in learned representations underexploited. We introduce graph smoothing as a general principle for train-time calibration, which encourages similar predictive distributions across neighboring samples in representation space. We analyze the effects of graph smoothing, deriving bounds that connect predictive divergence between neighboring samples to local confidence variation and to the propagation of pointwise calibration error, and characterize the conditions under which smoothing can or cannot improve calibration. In light of this analysis, we propose modelNoSpace, a graph-based train-time regularizer that penalizes the Jensen--Shannon divergence between predictive distributions of neighboring samples. We present a thorough empirical analysis, showing that across standard calibration benchmarks, model improves predictive quality, and the improvement is complementary to post-hoc calibration: after temperature scaling, model attains the lowest NLL of all evaluated train-time methods in seven of the eight image and tabular settings. These findings demonstrate the value of graph smoothing over learned representations for neural network calibration.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2026.

Builds on

3 of 56 references.

References · 3

  1. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  2. 2013Network In Networkcited by 605
  3. 2024Bridging Language and Items for Retrieval and Recommendation: Benchmarking LLMs as Semantic Encoderscited by 224

Built on by

Not cited yet.