Reinforcement Learning for Hierarchical Reasoning Rewards: Minimax-Optimal Rates with Transformers
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a standard tool for post-training language models on reasoning tasks, where the policy is updated by reward feedback while exploring the space of responses. Despite its empirical success, theoretical understanding of RL post-training remains limited, in particular of why on-policy exploration combined with a neural reward model is effective. In this paper, we address this question by modeling the reward as a hierarchical function on the response space: the reward consists of infinitely many local components, each of which becomes relevant only after the preceding ones have been resolved. We show that a natural Transformer-based actor--critic algorithm, which alternates between sampling from the current KL-regularized policy, fitting a Transformer critic to the observed rewards, and updating the policy, achieves the minimax optimal rates in the query budget and in the regularization strength up to logarithmic factors, and is minimax optimal for a fixed number of prompts. In contrast, we prove that sampling from the fixed reference distribution, as in offline reward modeling, can limit regret decay to a logarithmic rate. These results show that on-policy exploration progressively zooms in on the region where the reward is concentrated, and quantify its benefit for RL post-training.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Accelerating RL for LLM Reasoning with Optimal Advantage Regression
- 2025Reshaping Reasoning in LLMs: A Theoretical Analysis of RL Training Dynamics through Pattern Selection
- 2026Unlocking the Critic: Reward-Free Policy Optimization for LLM Post-Training
- 2024Teaching Large Language Models to Reason with Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Exploring the Limit of Outcome Reward for Learning Mathematical Reasoning
- 2025Unlocking Reasoning Capabilities in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning Exploration
- 2026TD-Grokking: Learning from Zero-Reward Problems by Training-Time Decomposition
- 2025The Reasoning Boundary Paradox: How Reinforcement Learning Constrains Language Models