mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Transect: Retaining Observability for Long-Horizon LLM Agent Evaluations

arXiv 2610.08364 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks also fits: Social simulation and multi-agent debate

Abstract (arXiv)

Frontier AI evaluations increasingly use open-ended, agentic, long-horizon tasks whose transcripts can span hundreds of pages of outputs and actions from complex multi-agent networks. The observability envelop-the range of what evaluators can reliably infer about an agent's behaviours-is therefore narrowing. Language model assistants can help classify and interpret agent behaviour but also afford human evaluators significant analytical degrees of freedom, threatening the reproducibility and auditability of language-model-based transcript analysis. Transect is an open source package built on Inspect Scout to help evaluators understand how a long agent run unfolded, identify behaviour worth investigating, and check interpretations against the transcript. Users specify task context and behavioural vocabulary in a reusable evaluation-family configuration, with judge models and analysis settings supplied separately. Transect's navigable reports align recorded events, token use, sub-agent activity, and model-generated behavioural labels on a common turn-based timeline. Reviewers can quickly grasp a run's narrative, trace any label or event to its source turns, and export the underlying data tables for cross-run analysis. We demonstrate the workflow on an AI R&D evaluation that generated almost 13 million tokens, dividing the agents' work into behavioural phases aligned with research-skill classifications, sub-agent delegations and interactions, and token use. The combined view shows a focus on operational work and manuscript production, with little evidence of a sustained hypothesis generation stage-arguably a necessary component for high-quality scientific outputs. Transect's flexible, customisable transcript-analysis pipeline will enable evaluators to keep pace with longer, more complex, more frequent AI evaluations while supporting scientific rigour, transparency, and reproducibility.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Large Language Models Often Know When They Are Being Evaluated
  2. 2026The Long-Horizon Task Mirage? Diagnosing Where and Why Agentic Systems Break
  3. 2026Agentic CLEAR: Automating Multi-Level Evaluation of LLM Agents
  4. 2026The Horizon Gap: Planning, Memory, Execution, Training, and Evaluation for Long-Horizon LLM Agents
  5. 2026Insights Generator: Systematic Corpus-Level Trace Diagnostics for LLM Agents
  6. 2025Agentic AI Process Observability: Discovering Behavioral Variability
  7. 2026AgentAtlas: Beyond Outcome Leaderboards for LLM Agents
  8. 2026Organising Trajectory Evidence for Language-Model Agent Assurance: Fragments, Methods, and the Residual