Adapting Vision-Language-Action Models to Unknown Visual Disruptions During Execution
On the map: Vision-language-action models → Failure recovery and robustness also fits: Reinforcement learning and post-training
Abstract (arXiv)
Visual disruptions can arise while a robot is executing a task, leaving a vision-language-action (VLA) policy to respond without knowing the disruption type or timing. We introduce Self-supervised Adaptation from Leftover Trajectories (SALT), which uses the leftover trajectory, the unexecuted part of the previous action chunk, as self-supervision for test-time adaptation. Because consecutive chunks overlap in time, the leftover provides a temporally aligned target for the current prediction over the same future control interval. At the onset of a visual shift, the leftover can retain a plan formed before the corruption, so updating the policy toward it anchors the adaptation across the shift (Transition Anchoring). SALT keeps the adapted policy and regenerates the current chunk, whose leftover becomes the target at the next replan, carrying the correction forward along the execution trajectory (Sequential Correction Propagation). Supervision comes entirely from the policy's own predictions, requiring no disruption annotations, expert actions, or target-domain demonstrations, and a lightweight adaptation gate calibrated only on nominal trajectories decides when updates begin. On LIBERO-10, SALT increases average success across five persistent visual corruptions from 43.9% to 53.2% with SmolVLA and from 58.7% to 66.0% with GR00T N1.7, while largely preserving nominal performance. On a real robot, it raises task progress averaged over digital and physical disruptions from 0.49 to 0.61.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Failure recovery and robustness, one of 13 directions in Vision-language-action models. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026VLA Knows Its Limits: Adaptive Execution Horizons for Robot Policies
- 2026VANE: Reliable Test-Time Training for Vision-Language-Action Models via Future Visual Representation Prediction
- 2026Self-Adaptive VLA for Robust Robot Deployment
- 2026Learning from Runtime Feedback through Failure-Bank Self-Evolution for Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2026Causeway: Restoring Task Accessibility for Instruction Switching in VLA Policies
- 2026ROAD-VLA: Robust Online Adaptation via Self-Distillation for Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2026Reflective VLA: In-Context Action Consequences Make VLAs Generalize
- 2026ChainVLA: Chaining Vision-Language-Action Queries through a Unified Execution State for Long-Horizon Manipulation