SOL: Measuring Gaps between Text Distributions by Double Sliced Wasserstein Metrics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Evaluating text generation requires measuring how well the generated distribution matches the data distribution. For autoregressive models, this is done by the perplexity. Diffusion and flow-based language models can only provide a likelihood bound, whose tightness differs between model families. Sample-based substitutes such as generative perplexity with entropy do not consider the distribution fit. We propose SOL, a distance between text distributions. Each sequence is represented by the empirical measure of its hidden states under a fixed transformer and the distributions of these measures are compared by the double sliced Wasserstein distance. We prove that SOL is a metric if the transformer is injective. Experiments show that SOL detects distributional failures, recovers expected model trends, and provides stable sample-based estimates. We put forward SOL to fill the gap in the current evaluation protocol used for non auto-regressive models. As a first step we use SOL to re-evaluate a variety of models trained on OpenWebText.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.
Builds on
24 of 76 references.
References · 24
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2022Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-trainingcited by 1,253
- 2022Diffusion-LM Improves Controllable Text Generationcited by 1,027
- 2024Simple and Effective Masked Diffusion Language Modelscited by 848
- 2023Discrete Diffusion Modeling by Estimating the Ratios of the Data Distributioncited by 745
- 2023Towards General Text Embeddings with Multi-stage Contrastive Learningcited by 723
- 2024Simplified and Generalized Masked Diffusion for Discrete Datacited by 626
- 2025Dream 7B: Diffusion Large Language Modelscited by 544
- 2025Block Diffusion: Interpolating Between Autoregressive and Diffusion Language Modelscited by 409
- 20242 OLMo 2 Furiouscited by 340
- 2013One Billion Word Benchmark for Measuring Progress in Statistical Language Modelingcited by 308
- 2022Continuous diffusion for categorical datacited by 214
12 more
- 2023Likelihood-Based Diffusion Language Modelscited by 151
- 2026Flow Map Language Models: One-step Language Modeling via Continuous Denoisingcited by 66
- 2026ELF: Embedded Language Flowscited by 45
- 2026LangFlow: Continuous Diffusion Rivals Discrete in Language Modelingcited by 36
- 2024Exploring Precision and Recall to assess the quality and diversity of LLMscited by 29
- 2025NeoBERT: A Next-Generation BERTcited by 16
- 2026Self-conditioned Flow Map Language Models via Fixed-point Flowscited by 14
- 2026Uniform Diffusion Models Revisited: Leave-One-Out Denoiser and Absorbing State Reformulationcited by 13
- 2026MIND: Monge Inception Distance for Generative Models Evaluationcited by 10
- 2026Hacking Generative Perplexity: Why Unconditional Text Evaluation Needs Distributional Metricscited by 7
- 2026Spherical Flows for Sampling Categorical Datacited by 6
- 2026Generalized Wasserstein Flow Matching: Transport Plans, Everywhere, All at Oncecited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.