mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sharp dimensional analysis of midpoint methods for Langevin sampling

arXiv 2610.06308 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2026math.ST cs.DS cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study deterministic and randomized midpoint discretizations of Langevin dynamics for a target π propto e-V, where 0 prec α Ipreceqnabla2Vpreceqβ I and kappa=β/α. To achieve √α,W2leqslantvarepsilon, we show that deterministic Heun uses at most widetilde O(kappa4/3d1/3varepsilon-2/3) gradient queries, and underdamped exponential midpoint uses widetilde O(kappa5/4d1/4varepsilon-1/2). The proofs exploit cancellation at stationarity and smoothing using techniques from Malliavin calculus, outperforming previous upper bounds based on standard couplings. At bounded condition number, a lower bound matches the d and varepsilon powers of both deterministic methods. To contrast, for the randomized midpoint methods and Poisson midpoint with at least two grid points (both overdamped and underdamped variants), a simple Gaussian calculation yields a lower bound d1/3varepsilon-1/3 to get an varepsilon-close sample despite starting at a benign initialization. This shows surprisingly that in high dimensions, deterministic discretizations can outperform their random counterparts.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.

Builds on

0 of 59 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.