mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Spectral Geometry of Attention: From Information Routing to Uncertainty

arXiv 2610.06012 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we study transformer attention through the lens of spectral geometry and operator theory. We view each attention head as a functional map between Hilbert spaces of functions on the token sequence and derive a Token Difference Operator, whose spectral structure controls how token-space information is routed to the output. We show that standard Euclidean spectra are structurally biased by sinks, conflating mass concentration with genuine routing capacity. By recasting token space in the intrinsic probability geometry induced by attention, the token difference spectrum disentangles sink effects from routing capacity and provides a spectral description of the dimensionality of the head output. This yields a unified framework for analyzing attention maps, explaining sinks, routing collapse, and output dimensionality within a single operator-theoretic framework. In practice, by grounding attention heuristics in spectral geometry, we develop a novel attention-based uncertainty estimator that complements probability-based scores, with the largest gains on long-context inputs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.

Builds on

26 of 38 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  3. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
  4. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,317
  5. 2023Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generationcited by 819
  6. 2018CoQA: A Conversational Question Answering Challengecited by 683
  7. 2019SAMSum Corpus: A Human-annotated Dialogue Dataset for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 535
  8. 2023Generating with Confidence: Uncertainty Quantification for Black-box Large Language Modelscited by 293
  9. 2020Unsupervised Quality Estimation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 211
  10. 2023Stabilizing Transformer Training by Preventing Attention Entropy Collapsecited by 161
  11. 2023Shifting Attention to Relevance: Towards the Predictive Uncertainty Quantification of Free-Form Large Language Modelscited by 150
  12. 2023LM-Polygraph: Uncertainty Estimation for Language Modelscited by 131
14 more
  1. 2025Why do LLMs attend to the first token?cited by 127
  2. 2024Transformers need glasses! Information over-squashing in language taskscited by 91
  3. 2024LUQ: Long-text Uncertainty Quantification for LLMscited by 81
  4. 2024Spectral Filters, Dark Signals, and Attention Sinkscited by 56
  5. 2025Attention Sinks and Compression Valleys in LLMs are Two Sides of the Same Coincited by 52
  6. 2025Hallucination Detection in LLMs Using Spectral Features of Attention Mapscited by 43
  7. 2025What are you sinking? A geometric approach on attention sinkcited by 28
  8. 2026The Spike, the Sparse and the Sink: Anatomy of Massive Activations and Attention Sinkscited by 27
  9. 2025Hallucination Detection in LLMs with Topological Divergence on Attention Graphscited by 19
  10. 2026Perplexity Cannot Always Tell Right from Wrongcited by 9
  11. 2026Semantic Uncertainty Quantification of Hallucinations in LLMs: A Quantum Tensor Network Based Methodcited by 7
  12. 2025Continuity and Isolation Lead to Doubts or Dilemmas in Large Language Modelscited by 3
  13. 2025A Graph Signal Processing Framework for Hallucination Detection in Large Language Modelscited by 3
  14. 2024SpectralKD: A Unified Framework for Interpreting and Distilling Vision Transformers via Spectral Analysiscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.