mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Label-Free Coreset Selection with Foundation Models for Efficient Annotation in Computational Pathology

arXiv 2610.05987 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Computational pathology has the potential to improve clinical outcomes through a demonstrated increase in diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. However, the development and validation of deep learning algorithms still require annotated data, a costly procedure involving expert pathologists who already face critical workforce shortages. Existing coreset selection methods to optimize annotation efforts currently all rely on hyperparameters tuned on natural-image benchmarks that do not transfer to histopathology and are cumbersome to use in clinical practice. In this study, we present GCcore, a novel label-free coreset selection method that embeds every image of a dataset with any pathology foundation model and greedily selects the samples that collectively maximize the global coverage of the embedding space. The proposed method provides a lower-bound guarantee on the global coverage of the returned coreset for any coreset size, while being completely hyperparameter-free and deterministic. We demonstrate GCcore's superior performance over 14 baselines including state-of-the-art methods across 10 tasks and datasets spanning whole slide image classification, tile classification, and tissue segmentation, where it ranks first on six and within the top three on nine, while also demonstrating how existing methods can shift by up to five rank positions depending on their hyperparameter settings. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/OncoAI-ULBHUB/GCcore.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.

Builds on

20 of 41 references.

References · 20

  1. 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 678
  2. 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 533
  3. 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 528
  4. 2019Selection via Proxy: Efficient Data Selection for Deep Learningcited by 339
  5. 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 261
  6. 2024Multimodal Whole Slide Foundation Model for Pathologycited by 162
  7. 2024Virchow2: Scaling Self-Supervised Mixed Magnification Models in Pathologycited by 161
  8. 2022Coverage-centric Coreset Selection for High Pruning Ratescited by 117
  9. 2024PRISM: A Multi-Modal Generative Foundation Model for Slide-Level Histopathologycited by 85
  10. 2021Going Deeper through the Gleason Scoring Scale: An Automatic end-to-end System for Histology Prostate Grading and Cribriform Pattern Detectioncited by 68
  11. 2024A Clinical Benchmark of Public Self-Supervised Pathology Foundation Modelscited by 66
  12. 2022WSSS4LUAD: Grand Challenge on Weakly-supervised Tissue Semantic Segmentation for Lung Adenocarcinomacited by 36
8 more
  1. 2024Multistain Pretraining for Slide Representation Learning in Pathologycited by 28
  2. 2025Data Pruning by Information Maximizationcited by 15
  3. 2024Low-resource finetuning of foundation models beats state-of-the-art in histopathologycited by 11
  4. 2024ELFS: Label-Free Coreset Selection with Proxy Training Dynamicscited by 10
  5. 2024Zero-Shot Coreset Selection via Iterative Subspace Samplingcited by 10
  6. 2023An interpretable machine learning system for colorectal cancer diagnosis from pathology slidescited by 9
  7. 2024Tissue Concepts: supervised foundation models in computational pathologycited by 8
  8. 2025A Multicentric Dataset for Training and Benchmarking Breast Cancer Segmentation in H&E Slidescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.