Byte Language Models: Scaling, Emergent Abstractions, and Information Allocation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Tokenizer-free language models remove the inductive bias of fixed tokenizers by modeling text directly as bytes, but the resulting longer sequences substantially increase computation and eliminate explicit text abstractions. We ask whether this additional computation can be useful, and whether standard Transformers can learn the abstractions that tokenization provides. We study these questions on Transformers without specialized tokenization-related architectures. With token-superposition training and hash embeddings, byte Transformers consistently outperform subword Transformers as model size scales. We further find that byte Transformers build local text abstractions as external tokenizers: a set of segmentation-like positions are used to collect local context representations, and restricting up to 25% of intermediate layers to these local representations preserves downstream performance. Finally, these learned structures induce highly non-uniform generation difficulty, with uncertainty concentrated near local structure boundaries; exploiting them for speculative decoding yields 3.4× more accepted tokens than in subword Transformers.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026ByteFlow: Language Modeling through Adaptive Byte Compression without a Tokenizer
- 2026The Efficiency Gap in Byte Modeling
- 2026A Family of LLMs Liberated from Static Vocabularies
- 2024MambaByte: Token-free Selective State Space Model
- 2025Direct Multi-Token Decoding
- 2025Length-MAX Tokenizer for Language Models
- 2024MrT5: Dynamic Token Merging for Efficient Byte-level Language Models
- 2024Turning Trash into Treasure: Accelerating Inference of Large Language Models with Token Recycling