mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

End-to-End Autonomous Recursive Arborescence Deformable Flow and Non-Linear Hemodynamics for Patient-Specific Coronary Centerline Extraction

arXiv 2610.05900 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2026cs.CV q-bio.TOcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Extracting patient-specific vascular trees from volumetric medical images is fundamental to computational angiography and non-invasive hemodynamic assessment. Conventional voxel segmentation models often sever delicate bifurcations, while heuristic Euclidean Minimum Spanning Trees introduce non-anatomical shortcuts. Moreover, linear Poiseuille flow neglects quadratic kinetic dissipation across arterial narrowings, underestimating ischemia. We formulate an end-to-end framework decoupling continuous geometric arborescence generation from non-linear hemodynamics. First, an autonomous 3D Ostium Landmark Localization Head with dual-sinus query channels and spherical-gated refinement eliminates centerline seeding dependency, achieving cohort mean localization error of 7.63 mm (7.43 mm LCA, 7.83 mm RCA; 71.4% <= 8.0 mm) from raw contrast context. Second, a Spatially-Grounded Deformable Step Flow Architecture queries continuous 3D feature pyramids via trilinear sampling, sequentially generating trajectories with anchor boundary enforcement (X(0) = P_start). Third, a Top-Down Recursive Arborescence State Machine detects bifurcation peaks via Tree-NMS and parameterizes predecessor parent pointers (p_k < k), guaranteeing single connected acyclic tree topology (beta_0 = 1, beta_1 = 0) with differentiable step termination. Fourth, an iterative Picard non-linear Kirchhoff solver with Young-Tsai / Gould quadratic dissipation enforces machine-precision mass conservation (residual 5.82e-11 mL/s). Across 14 development patients under standardized in-silico stenosis stress testing (Q_0 = 4.0 mL/s), linear Poiseuille flow misclassifies 75% diameter lesions as non-ischemic (FFR > 0.80) in 14/14 cases, whereas our non-linear solver captures functional ischemia (FFR = 0.5864, lesion disparity 32.89 mmHg, p = 6.10e-5) with 3.66x collateral shunting. Test set firewall isolation was maintained.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.

Builds on

14 of 49 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
  3. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,700
  4. 20183D MRI brain tumor segmentation using autoencoder regularizationcited by 328
  5. 2020clDice -- A Novel Topology-Preserving Loss Function for Tubular Structure Segmentationcited by 294
  6. 2026Generative Modeling via Driftingcited by 116
  7. 2023Dynamic Snake Convolution based on Topological Geometric Constraints for Tubular Structure Segmentationcited by 84
  8. 2025DeformCL: Learning Deformable Centerline Representation for Vessel Extraction in 3D Medical Imagecited by 5
  9. 2025A topology-preserving three-stage framework for fully-connected coronary artery extractioncited by 3
  10. 2025RefTr: Recurrent Refinement of Confluent Trajectories for 3D Vascular Tree Centerlinescited by 2
  11. 2026VesselTok: Tokenizing Vessel-like 3D Biomedical Graph Representations for Reconstruction and Generationcited by 2
  12. 2025Dynamic Snake Upsampling Operater and Boundary-Skeleton Weighted Loss for Tubular Structure Segmentationcited by 1
2 more
  1. 2026Same Branches, Different Trees: A Bifurcation Connectedness Metric for Coronary Artery Segmentation and FFR-CT Decision Agreementcited by 1
  2. 2026ImageCAS-X: a dataset and benchmark for coronary artery segmentation and centerline extraction in coronary CT angiographycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.